Cam — CS2 Stats

76561197963378309[U:1:3112581]✓ No bans

2,134Tracked matches74%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,840Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning50

Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–41–8Last 10051%Win rateWLLTWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression7.3

Utility6.7

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch5.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.89 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning5.0

Utility6.7

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time578ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms

Headshot accuracy18.4%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–7

13–0Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	28	16–12	57%	0.03
mirage	C	24	9–15	38%	0.02
nuke	D	15	5–10	33%	0.01
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
cache	A	8	5–3	63%	0.02
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	0.05
ancient	S	5	4–1	80%	0.03
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

388Matches

49%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

82.7ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	58	52%	1.04	14.8
Anubis	45	58%	1.11	16.8
Ancient	35	60%	1.22	17.3
Inferno	35	43%	1.11	15.3
Vertigo	32	38%	1.12	17.6
Nuke	27	44%	0.98	15.7
Dust2	23	48%	1.06	17.5
Train	2	50%	2.12	21.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

75.7%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

583msReaction time

35.7%T opening success

48.6%CT opening success

0.89Enemies flashed / flash

4.7%Flash assists

13.74HE damage / grenade

8.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.6993% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	-0.01	10%	28 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	13%	28 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	10%	27 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	8%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.06	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–0	-0.02	33%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.07	16%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	13%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	19%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	13%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	15%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.07	22%	15 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	10%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	18%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	16%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.14	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	12%	29 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.09	15%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	27%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.01	19%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.10	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	26%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	28%	21 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.00	18%	20 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	16%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.00	32%	16 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	19%	15 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	19%	15 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	24%	15 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.02	40%	14 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	23%	14 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.00	0%	13 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	15%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.07	19%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.02	22%	12 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.05	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	9%	9 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	3 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	12%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.09	11%	3 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	22%	30 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.03	19%	30 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.01	16%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	13%	28 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	27%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	26 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.02	19%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.00	18%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.07	21%	24 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	20%	24 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	15%	12 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	21%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.05	15%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	8%	11 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.12	18%	11 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.04	16%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.14	14%	10 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.03	11%	10 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.02	23%	10 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	27%	9 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	11%	9 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.04	11%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.02	19%	7 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.00	9%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	13%	6 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.00	26%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.03	11%	5 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.01	19%	5 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.05	26%	5 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.01	20%	4 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.09	18%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.09	11%	3 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.06	27%	3 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.04	13%	3 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.15	13%	2 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	11%	1 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.05	18%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–2	-0.00	10%	1 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.03	57%	1 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.10	16%	1 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.05	5%	31 May →
nuke	13–8	0.13	23%	31 May →
nuke	11–13	0.05	13%	30 May →
inferno	13–10	0.06	11%	30 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	10%	29 May →
dust2	13–9	0.03	11%	29 May →
anubis	13–11	0.01	10%	29 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	18%	28 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	5%	28 May →
nuke	11–13	0.02	11%	28 May →
dust2	3–13	0.09	17%	28 May →
dust2	12–12	0.04	6%	27 May →
mirage	13–7	0.04	15%	27 May →
vertigo	11–13	0.01	8%	26 May →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	18%	26 May →
dust2	13–7	0.17	32%	26 May →