Burr — CS2 Stats

76561198067165018[U:1:106899290]

964Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,761Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning46
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression3.2
Utility3.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch1.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.6
Utility3.3
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy31.8%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 34.9% → last ⅓ avg 31.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–0
130Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25111444%-0.01
dust2A2012860%-0.02
nukeC1661038%-0.00
infernoS128467%-0.01
ancientS1210283%0.01
overpassA85363%-0.01
anubisD62433%0.04
cache110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

144,054Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
4,439Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
39.6%Headshot %
18.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
12,326MVPs
2,638Hours (in match)
5,961Bombs planted
1,385Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4765,558
AWP15,776
P2503,321
Knife2,290
Tec-92,185

Lifetime map wins

9,207dust2
8,755inferno
3,661train
2,455nuke
2,282cbble
1,426vertigo
110dust
108italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,406Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1436%0.9015.5
Dust21436%0.9914.8
Ancient667%1.0817.0
Inferno540%1.4217.0
Nuke580%1.5125.6
Anubis40%0.6810.5
Overpass250%1.1618.0
Train1100%1.2228.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
588msReaction time
23.7%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
7.82HE damage / grenade
6.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.6799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–90.1239%24 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0127%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.097%29 Jun
dust213–9-0.0321%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0747%21 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0729%19 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0325%15 Jun
anubis7–130.0926%14 Jun
cache13–60.0520%14 Jun
dust25–13-0.0644%13 Jun
nuke13–70.0243%13 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0231%13 Jun
dust25–130.0232%13 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0833%8 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0831%8 Jun
mirage13–80.0539%8 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0538%8 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0418%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0639%1 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0232%1 Jun
nuke9–130.0033%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0923%18 May
dust29–130.0229%18 May
inferno13–3-0.0255%18 May
anubis8–20.0135%17 May
inferno10–13-0.0140%17 May
nuke14–160.0737%13 May
mirage13–80.0929%13 May
nuke11–13-0.0620%13 May
mirage13–6-0.0221%13 May
inferno13–80.0232%11 May
dust213–80.0143%11 May
nuke15–15-0.0529%11 May
dust21–13-0.1429%11 May
ancient13–7-0.0332%11 May
overpass13–10-0.0433%11 May
dust213–7-0.0622%11 May
mirage3–13-0.0832%11 May
anubis13–00.1220%10 May
mirage14–16-0.0520%10 May
ancient13–60.0826%8 May
mirage13–80.0635%8 May
mirage12–16-0.0533%8 May
dust213–9-0.0724%8 May
ancient13–10-0.0233%8 May
dust216–12-0.0527%8 May
nuke8–13-0.0114%8 May
mirage13–11-0.0217%8 May
ancient13–10-0.0152%8 May
ancient6–130.0024%7 May
anubis6–130.0134%7 May
dust213–11-0.0334%7 May
dust213–50.0126%7 May
dust21–13-0.0330%7 May
ancient13–110.0932%7 May
nuke8–130.0838%7 May
dust216–14-0.0635%7 May
inferno16–140.0127%7 May
nuke6–13-0.0239%7 May
dust28–13-0.0613%6 May
mirage13–110.0331%6 May
nuke13–9-0.0229%6 May
inferno13–40.0153%6 May
ancient13–7-0.0332%6 May
inferno13–90.0327%6 May
mirage13–80.0246%5 May
dust213–11-0.0445%5 May
mirage11–130.0528%5 May
mirage7–130.0227%4 May
dust29–130.0247%4 May
inferno13–9-0.0827%4 May
inferno15–15-0.0138%4 May
mirage13–70.0017%4 May
ancient13–60.0933%4 May
ancient13–80.0331%4 May
mirage11–13-0.0533%4 May
overpass13–9-0.0130%4 May
dust213–10-0.0141%3 May
inferno13–110.0029%3 May
overpass5–13-0.0658%27 Apr
mirage13–100.0143%27 Apr
nuke13–80.0327%27 Apr
mirage13–80.1037%27 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0133%27 Apr
overpass16–130.0336%27 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0140%27 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0228%27 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0348%19 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0527%19 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0146%19 Apr
anubis5–130.0147%18 Apr
overpass13–90.0238%18 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0424%18 Apr
dust213–40.0935%18 Apr
dust24–13-0.0538%13 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0337%13 Apr
ancient13–80.0135%13 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0338%13 Apr
nuke13–30.0524%13 Apr
dust213–110.0432%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →