TheDoctorsCat

TheDoctorsCat — CS2 Stats

76561198067049808[U:1:106784080]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

952Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,404Blue band · top ~42.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37113 of 55013 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTheDoctorsCatFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,404 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning39
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateLLWWWTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.9
Utility3.8
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.9
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time620ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27141352%0.00
dust2D1961332%-0.00
infernoC145936%0.00
nukeB147750%0.01
overpassS64267%0.00
cacheC52340%-0.02
anubis42250%-0.04
vertigo32167%0.04
warden3030%-0.01
train21150%0.02
shelter1010%-0.04
ancient110100%0.02
alpine1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches
53%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10%0.8612.0
Vertigo1100%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
618msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
5.52HE damage / grenade
3.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4606 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0018%22 Aug
mirage1–70.0022%22 Aug
dust213–40.0927%22 Aug
inferno6–2-0.0150%22 Aug
overpass13–8-0.0418%22 Aug
cache12–120.0117%24 Jul
dust20–13-0.1513%24 Jul
inferno10–5-0.0227%18 Jul
dust29–130.1120%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0425%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0321%18 Jul
mirage13–10.1232%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0427%18 Jul
shelter9–13-0.0413%18 Jul
mirage1–130.0824%17 Jul
nuke13–60.0114%12 Jul
cache13–100.0120%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0124%27 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0223%27 Jun
cache13–8-0.0220%27 Jun
cache2–3-0.1013%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0429%17 Jun
train7–130.0218%17 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.0224%1 Mar
dust213–9-0.0311%28 Feb
dust23–130.0629%28 Feb
warden4–130.0318%21 Feb
inferno11–130.0117%15 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0413%15 Feb
mirage1–13-0.074%15 Feb
dust25–13-0.0711%15 Feb
mirage10–130.0116%14 Feb
overpass14–16-0.0114%14 Feb
anubis13–5-0.0410%14 Feb
dust213–10-0.0133%14 Feb
inferno13–70.0016%14 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0411%14 Feb
nuke13–40.1110%14 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0625%14 Feb
dust27–130.0115%8 Feb
dust213–9-0.019%8 Feb
warden10–13-0.048%8 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0426%8 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0411%8 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0016%8 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0010%8 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0413%7 Feb
ancient13–100.0215%7 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0413%7 Feb
mirage9–130.0420%7 Feb
inferno13–70.0012%7 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0412%7 Feb
inferno13–100.0416%7 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0014%1 Feb
dust24–13-0.0512%1 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0117%1 Feb
nuke13–40.0316%1 Feb
nuke13–20.0516%1 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0228%1 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0713%31 Jan
inferno11–130.0218%31 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0522%31 Jan
overpass13–40.0828%31 Jan
nuke7–130.0332%31 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0212%31 Jan
dust26–13-0.0125%29 Jan
mirage13–100.0324%29 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0313%24 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0211%24 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0812%24 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0811%24 Jan
dust24–13-0.0426%24 Jan
overpass0–13-0.088%24 Jan
warden1–13-0.0211%24 Jan
inferno4–130.0313%24 Jan
mirage12–120.0313%24 Jan
inferno1–130.0515%24 Jan
dust29–13-0.0329%24 Jan
alpine9–130.0519%23 Jan
mirage13–30.0215%23 Jan
vertigo13–40.0314%23 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0115%16 Jan
dust213–110.0533%3 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0224%3 Jan
mirage13–80.0421%1 Jan
vertigo13–30.1029%1 Jan
nuke8–130.0123%1 Jan
inferno10–130.0729%1 Jan
mirage16–130.0724%25 Dec
nuke13–110.0715%25 Dec
dust28–13-0.0125%25 Dec
overpass13–80.0219%21 Dec
nuke13–80.0818%21 Dec
train13–100.0124%21 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0421%21 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0213%21 Dec
dust27–130.0714%21 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0715%14 Dec
overpass13–70.0413%14 Dec
dust29–130.0332%14 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →