Jupe — CS2 Stats

76561198124260800[U:1:163995072]

2,506Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning54

Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression8.0

Utility2.0

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.4

Utility2.0

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time651ms−24ms

first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms

Headshot accuracy25.4%+5.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — office 2–0

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6officeWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	17	9–8	53%	0.02
cache	D	15	5–10	33%	0.01
office	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.00
vertigo	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
mirage	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	0.01
ancient	S	6	5–1	83%	0.03
overpass	D	6	2–4	33%	0.02
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
shelter	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03
italy	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
alpine	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,286Matches

51%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

86.2ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

40%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	10	50%	1.32	20.0
Anubis	7	43%	1.09	16.9
Mirage	6	67%	1.30	14.5
Vertigo	5	40%	1.02	13.6
Inferno	4	50%	1.10	15.8
Train	2	100%	1.72	27.5
Ancient	2	50%	2.37	22.0
Cache	1	0%	0.87	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy

31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

77.2%Counter-strafing

11.9°Preaim

642msReaction time

26.9%T opening success

62.4%CT opening success

0.21Enemies flashed / flash

1.9%Flash assists

14.39HE damage / grenade

1.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2056 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.9392% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	7–13	0.05	10%	30 Aug →
shelter	6–13	-0.00	29%	29 Aug →
office	2–13	-0.03	45%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	24%	25 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.03	24%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.06	14%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	29%	23 Aug →
train	12–12	0.05	21%	23 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.07	50%	23 Aug →
office	2–0	0.17	50%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	20%	20 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.05	19%	20 Aug →
overpass	8–13	0.01	16%	19 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	7%	9 Aug →
shelter	13–7	-0.05	31%	9 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	15%	7 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	-0.05	14%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.09	23%	5 Aug →
office	5–13	0.00	43%	2 Aug →
office	3–13	-0.13	7%	1 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	20%	30 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.09	26%	30 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	30%	25 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	18%	25 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.04	29%	25 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	24%	22 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	14%	22 Jul →
italy	9–13	-0.02	27%	21 Jul →
office	3–13	-0.02	38%	21 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	29%	21 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	-0.10	38%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	31%	19 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.01	23%	19 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.00	29%	16 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	14%	14 Jul →
boulder	8–13	0.03	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.09	11%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.11	25%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.08	26%	12 Jul →
office	12–12	-0.01	20%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	21%	12 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	22%	12 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.08	32%	12 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	23%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	18%	11 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	8%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.07	23%	11 Jul →
office	13–4	-0.02	18%	11 Jul →
boulder	13–2	0.03	17%	10 Jul →
italy	13–5	0.06	19%	10 Jul →
fachwerk	13–11	0.01	16%	10 Jul →
shelter	12–12	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	18%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	31%	10 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	21%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	27%	6 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.04	17%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	13%	4 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.01	16%	3 Jul →
alpine	13–11	-0.04	18%	28 Jun →
office	13–11	0.02	13%	27 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.05	18%	27 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	15%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	31%	26 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	24%	26 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.04	21%	26 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	0.06	23%	24 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.11	4%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.06	18%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.09	17%	22 Jun →
office	2–13	-0.04	25%	21 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	10%	17 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.01	28%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.07	26%	13 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.10	34%	12 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.04	18%	11 Jun →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	19%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.06	13%	9 Jun →
overpass	10–13	0.05	23%	9 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	14%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	29%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.01	13%	8 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.01	16%	7 Jun →
alpine	9–13	0.11	19%	6 Jun →
italy	12–12	0.03	26%	6 Jun →
office	11–13	0.08	21%	5 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	18%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.01	13%	5 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	0.02	34%	5 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.04	19%	5 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	15%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.10	22%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.09	18%	4 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.01	14%	3 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.05	23%	3 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	14%	3 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	18%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	9%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.06	50%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.01	21%	2 Jun →