¿ — CS2 Stats

76561198064766298[U:1:104500570]

1,292Tracked matches42%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,501Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,697Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3891 of 6900 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate40.3%48.1%7.8% short
Shot accuracy15.4%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.08above
Match win rate46.4%46.5%meets

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG¿PREMIER17,697 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning47
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42517Last 10042%Win rateLLTLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression6.9
Utility5.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−5.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–2
121Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 23ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2314961%0.04
nukeC2181338%0.03
dust2D1851328%0.01
cacheB179853%0.02
infernoC104640%-0.01
ancientD5050%-0.05
anubis42250%0.05
office1010%0.02
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,983Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
4,840Matches
46.4%Match win rate
40.3%Headshot %
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
11,270MVPs
1,988Hours (in match)
5,251Bombs planted
1,633Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,888dust2
5,116nuke
3,817inferno
685train
580cbble
491vertigo
414office
110lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
552msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
52.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.64HE damage / grenade
6.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5696% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient1–8-0.0616%19 Aug
nuke6–130.0117%19 Aug
mirage12–120.0517%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.075%4 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0020%2 Aug
cache6–130.0423%2 Aug
dust28–130.0117%2 Aug
cache13–11-0.0213%2 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0513%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0116%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0615%31 Jul
dust213–30.0229%31 Jul
cache13–100.0819%30 Jul
nuke13–80.0815%30 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0116%30 Jul
cache0–13-0.1123%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0722%30 Jul
cache13–110.0113%30 Jul
nuke13–70.0531%30 Jul
anubis15–150.0313%30 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0224%30 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0816%29 Jul
mirage12–120.1112%29 Jul
nuke5–130.0224%29 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0422%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0018%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0316%28 Jul
mirage5–130.0413%28 Jul
dust212–120.0114%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0311%28 Jul
mirage15–15-0.039%27 Jul
cache11–130.0210%26 Jul
dust213–160.0317%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0120%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0612%26 Jul
nuke10–130.0614%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0920%24 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0824%24 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0112%24 Jul
dust216–130.0013%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0614%24 Jul
nuke13–80.0518%24 Jul
dust213–6-0.0017%24 Jul
office7–130.0226%24 Jul
cache11–130.0921%24 Jul
dust26–130.0819%24 Jul
mirage14–160.0412%24 Jul
mirage12–10.0610%23 Jul
nuke10–130.0423%23 Jul
dust213–60.0514%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0810%22 Jul
nuke5–130.0522%21 Jul
dust29–130.0136%21 Jul
nuke8–130.0421%21 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0115%20 Jul
cache13–100.0226%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0510%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0731%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0611%20 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0313%19 Jul
nuke13–110.0213%19 Jul
cache5–13-0.0329%19 Jul
mirage9–130.0418%19 Jul
nuke5–13-0.045%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0113%18 Jul
anubis10–130.0413%18 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0419%18 Jul
dust210–130.0115%18 Jul
nuke9–130.0428%18 Jul
dust210–130.0524%18 Jul
mirage16–130.0116%18 Jul
cache13–50.1027%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0416%17 Jul
mirage11–130.0321%17 Jul
nuke11–130.0116%17 Jul
mirage6–130.0623%17 Jul
nuke13–16-0.047%17 Jul
mirage13–20.1321%17 Jul
inferno7–130.0610%17 Jul
nuke13–100.0919%12 Jul
dust21–13-0.1033%12 Jul
dust210–130.0529%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0633%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.089%12 Jul
train11–13-0.0227%12 Jul
cache13–40.0614%12 Jul
cache13–20.1037%12 Jul
cache13–90.0825%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0118%11 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0119%11 Jul
dust212–120.0223%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0521%10 Jul
dust213–2-0.060%10 Jul
inferno4–00.000%10 Jul
mirage13–100.0022%10 Jul
nuke2–00.09100%10 Jul
dust22–13-0.0416%10 Jul
cache10–130.0027%10 Jul
mirage13–30.0634%10 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0023%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →