Jibbles — CS2 Stats

76561198061751993[U:1:101486265]✓ No bans

1,377Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,304Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.7%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy17.6%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.170.990.99above
Match win rate38.8%43.9%44.2%5.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJibblesFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning44
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression6.3
Utility5.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.9

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time675ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 675ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — warden 13–5
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA49282157%0.00
infernoC135838%-0.01
mirageA117464%0.04
dust2D62433%0.01
ancientB63350%0.01
anubisB63350%-0.00
nuke43175%0.03
overpass32167%0.01
warden110100%0.19
stronghold1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,921Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
6,655Matches
38.8%Match win rate
43.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
12,104MVPs
2,304Hours (in match)
5,787Bombs planted
1,262Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,646
AWP15,216
P2504,936
P903,453
MP92,683

Lifetime map wins

12,193inferno
3,203dust2
2,127train
972nuke
861vertigo
847cbble
687office
391lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
676msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.11HE damage / grenade
6.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7456% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0138%20 Jul
dust23–130.0221%20 Jul
mirage11–130.1322%17 Jul
inferno8–130.0038%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0630%15 Jul
cache13–70.0623%11 Jul
nuke8–130.0120%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.068%5 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0411%30 Jun
mirage13–60.0725%30 Jun
ancient13–50.0829%27 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0123%26 Jun
inferno13–60.0235%22 Jun
ancient13–80.0121%19 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0526%18 Jun
inferno6–130.0737%14 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0925%14 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0516%14 Jun
dust27–00.0212%14 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0113%14 Jun
cache13–8-0.0322%11 Jun
dust23–13-0.0525%11 Jun
anubis13–9-0.017%11 Jun
overpass13–160.0526%9 Jun
cache4–13-0.0417%8 Jun
cache8–13-0.0322%5 Jun
cache13–8-0.0616%3 Jun
nuke13–20.0130%13 May
inferno6–90.0731%13 May
cache13–100.1619%10 May
cache13–90.0122%10 May
cache8–13-0.0514%10 May
cache7–13-0.0527%10 May
cache13–100.0317%9 May
cache6–13-0.0531%9 May
cache13–8-0.0235%7 May
cache8–13-0.0331%7 May
cache13–30.0116%7 May
warden13–50.1928%7 May
cache4–13-0.0313%7 May
cache13–60.0024%6 May
cache12–12-0.0420%6 May
cache13–10-0.0320%4 May
cache12–12-0.0125%4 May
mirage13–110.0928%4 May
cache8–13-0.0529%4 May
cache13–9-0.0529%4 May
cache13–6-0.0123%4 May
cache13–60.0922%4 May
cache12–12-0.0224%4 May
cache6–130.0436%4 May
cache13–7-0.0529%4 May
inferno10–130.0220%4 May
dust211–130.0429%4 May
cache12–120.0521%4 May
cache10–13-0.0216%4 May
cache13–60.0430%4 May
nuke9–40.0830%4 May
cache13–11-0.0722%3 May
cache13–40.0433%3 May
cache3–80.044%3 May
cache13–100.0234%3 May
cache7–13-0.0123%3 May
cache12–120.0243%3 May
anubis11–130.0522%3 May
mirage13–110.0226%3 May
cache13–60.0323%3 May
cache13–50.0521%2 May
cache13–11-0.0027%2 May
cache13–20.0329%2 May
cache13–40.1927%2 May
cache4–130.0023%2 May
inferno9–4-0.0330%2 May
dust211–130.0012%2 May
cache13–3-0.0215%1 May
cache13–4-0.0729%1 May
stronghold1–13-0.1015%1 May
cache10–13-0.0123%1 May
cache13–50.0231%1 May
cache2–13-0.0123%1 May
cache13–30.0331%1 May
cache13–10.0228%1 May
cache11–130.0727%1 May
mirage16–12-0.0224%1 May
inferno13–9-0.0214%25 Apr
inferno11–13-0.1015%25 Apr
ancient13–50.0946%22 Apr
mirage10–130.1022%19 Apr
mirage13–60.1344%16 Apr
nuke13–100.0027%12 Apr
anubis8–130.0429%8 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0715%8 Apr
overpass13–50.0418%3 Apr
ancient4–130.0418%3 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0711%20 Mar
mirage12–16-0.0216%20 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0313%19 Mar
anubis13–60.0110%18 Mar
dust213–90.0316%14 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0823%14 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →