Bart Bretsneedler — CS2 Stats

76561198059468616[U:1:99202888]

1,586Tracked matches29%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,581Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24122 of 47562 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBart BretsneedlerFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER17,581 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39583Last 10039%Win rateLLLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression6.2
Utility4.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 667ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time666ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 690ms → last ⅓ avg 666ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–6
130Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
17In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2181338%0.00
ancientC1871139%0.01
anubisC1761135%-0.02
infernoD1551033%0.01
dust2C125742%0.01
vertigoS64267%-0.01
nuke42250%0.03
overpass31233%0.03
cache21150%-0.03
office2020%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
72.1ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2100%0.9224.0
Mirage20%0.8012.0
Vertigo1100%1.2211.0
Inferno1100%1.4320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
88.5%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
667msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
6.35HE damage / grenade
11.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4255 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2989% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.0725%18 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0725%18 Aug
cache9–13-0.1018%3 Aug
dust21–13-0.0233%3 Aug
cache13–100.0420%22 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0620%22 Jul
inferno11–130.0015%21 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0725%21 Apr
ancient10–13-0.019%7 Apr
vertigo13–10-0.090%26 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0235%9 Mar
dust28–13-0.0224%9 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0336%5 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0759%5 Mar
inferno12–12-0.0114%5 Mar
ancient12–12-0.0011%5 Mar
dust213–60.1517%14 Feb
nuke2–130.0224%13 Feb
mirage11–130.0920%13 Feb
dust210–130.0618%13 Feb
mirage13–80.0510%12 Feb
ancient9–130.0427%12 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0127%12 Feb
overpass9–130.0322%12 Feb
dust213–60.0522%12 Feb
dust26–130.0312%11 Feb
ancient5–90.0121%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0337%11 Feb
overpass4–130.0320%11 Feb
anubis13–00.0325%11 Feb
nuke13–100.0820%11 Feb
mirage8–130.0820%10 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0320%10 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0227%10 Feb
ancient8–130.0312%9 Feb
nuke13–70.0428%9 Feb
dust213–40.0622%9 Feb
overpass13–70.039%9 Feb
ancient6–130.0513%9 Feb
anubis6–130.0219%9 Feb
inferno10–50.0419%9 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0221%9 Feb
ancient13–10.1118%8 Feb
mirage13–40.0228%8 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0614%8 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0127%8 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0618%8 Feb
mirage3–130.0136%8 Feb
vertigo5–13-0.0119%6 Feb
mirage13–80.0116%4 Feb
inferno13–50.0320%4 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0512%4 Feb
ancient13–60.0513%4 Feb
office0–8-0.0429%2 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0442%2 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0410%2 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0223%2 Feb
ancient13–40.0823%2 Feb
office11–13-0.0215%30 Jan
ancient13–70.0320%30 Jan
anubis13–70.017%30 Jan
inferno10–130.0112%30 Jan
mirage13–100.0719%30 Jan
inferno1–13-0.0850%28 Jan
vertigo13–50.0325%28 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0213%27 Jan
anubis13–70.0314%27 Jan
inferno13–110.0520%27 Jan
mirage13–8-0.038%27 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0216%27 Jan
inferno12–12-0.0321%27 Jan
anubis6–130.065%27 Jan
mirage13–40.1314%27 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0724%27 Jan
mirage11–130.0010%26 Jan
vertigo13–10-0.015%26 Jan
inferno13–30.1023%26 Jan
ancient7–130.0319%26 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0520%26 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0217%26 Jan
anubis8–130.0423%22 Jan
inferno13–30.1020%22 Jan
ancient13–10-0.027%22 Jan
vertigo13–10-0.0420%20 Jan
dust27–13-0.0613%20 Jan
ancient9–130.0117%19 Jan
anubis6–130.0018%19 Jan
dust24–13-0.0517%19 Jan
vertigo9–130.0611%17 Jan
dust213–90.0120%17 Jan
ancient13–40.0115%17 Jan
mirage7–13-0.008%17 Jan
dust213–9-0.0024%15 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0713%15 Jan
dust26–13-0.0332%13 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0323%12 Dec
mirage2–13-0.0133%26 Nov
mirage3–13-0.0015%26 Nov
anubis13–8-0.0118%7 Nov
mirage6–13-0.1013%7 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →