m1 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198056901217[U:1:96635489]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

907Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.9 Learning

Premier CS Rating19,604Purple band · top ~10.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13451 of 30911 tracked

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning42

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateWLLLTWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression6.0

Utility5.7

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning4.2

Utility5.7

Mechanics3.2

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact0.6

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time651ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms

Headshot accuracy18.6%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — sanctum 9–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 0% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
poseidon	B	31	16–15	52%	0.00
mirage	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.01
sanctum	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.00
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.03
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.02
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.04
dust2	D	6	0–6	0%	-0.07
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04
cache	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
debris	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.06
eldorado	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.09
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,521Matches

51%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

79.5ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	75	43%	1.02	16.1
Ancient	34	47%	0.96	15.2
Inferno	34	50%	0.87	15.3
Dust2	26	54%	1.25	17.4
Anubis	20	30%	0.87	15.1
Vertigo	9	22%	0.80	13.9
Nuke	6	50%	0.92	13.8
Overpass	5	20%	0.71	11.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.9%Spray accuracy

64.2%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

614msReaction time

40.3%T opening success

38.8%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

6.30HE damage / grenade

7.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 38.8433% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–5	0.04	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	10%	4 Aug →
poseidon	3–9	-0.09	15%	4 Aug →
poseidon	8–8	0.07	17%	4 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	-0.01	4%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–1	-0.02	18%	3 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	17%	3 Aug →
poseidon	8–8	0.07	25%	2 Aug →
debris	7–9	-0.09	23%	31 Jul →
eldorado	4–9	-0.12	17%	31 Jul →
eldorado	9–7	-0.13	20%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	19%	28 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	26%	28 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	11%	28 Jul →
poseidon	9–3	0.10	17%	18 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.03	44%	18 Jul →
eldorado	9–7	-0.01	11%	17 Jul →
debris	9–2	0.00	43%	14 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.08	8%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	22%	2 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	25%	2 Jul →
mirage	22–19	0.02	16%	21 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	9%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	14%	15 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	21%	15 Jun →
overpass	4–13	-0.01	9%	15 Jun →
sanctum	6–9	-0.11	9%	11 Apr →
sanctum	9–2	0.01	17%	11 Apr →
poseidon	9–3	0.24	20%	11 Apr →
overpass	7–13	0.05	18%	27 Mar →
sanctum	9–4	0.07	19%	27 Mar →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	33%	27 Mar →
sanctum	6–9	-0.10	16%	27 Mar →
poseidon	2–9	-0.19	29%	27 Mar →
poseidon	6–9	-0.03	17%	25 Mar →
poseidon	9–3	0.15	9%	25 Mar →
poseidon	9–4	0.04	28%	22 Mar →
dust2	5–13	-0.13	8%	22 Mar →
poseidon	9–6	0.00	29%	21 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	24%	21 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	23%	21 Mar →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	14%	14 Mar →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	10%	14 Mar →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	20%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–1	0.07	24%	14 Mar →
sanctum	2–9	-0.14	19%	13 Mar →
poseidon	9–7	0.07	18%	13 Mar →
anubis	13–4	-0.05	50%	12 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	17%	12 Mar →
inferno	13–7	0.03	23%	12 Mar →
poseidon	4–9	-0.11	19%	12 Mar →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	28%	11 Mar →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	16%	11 Mar →
anubis	13–3	-0.04	4%	10 Mar →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	24%	10 Mar →
poseidon	0–9	-0.10	0%	10 Mar →
sanctum	6–9	-0.01	29%	10 Mar →
sanctum	9–6	-0.04	32%	9 Mar →
poseidon	4–9	-0.11	22%	9 Mar →
poseidon	9–5	0.07	30%	9 Mar →
ancient	14–16	0.02	15%	9 Mar →
inferno	1–9	-0.10	14%	9 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	16%	2 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.02	23%	2 Mar →
mirage	1–13	-0.00	33%	2 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	35%	1 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.06	15%	1 Mar →
sanctum	9–1	0.25	36%	1 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.01	15%	28 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	18%	28 Feb →
sanctum	4–9	-0.05	13%	28 Feb →
poseidon	8–8	0.00	18%	28 Feb →
poseidon	1–9	-0.27	0%	28 Feb →
poseidon	9–6	0.02	25%	28 Feb →
sanctum	9–7	0.10	30%	22 Feb →
poseidon	9–5	0.03	44%	22 Feb →
poseidon	9–1	0.20	24%	22 Feb →
poseidon	3–9	-0.10	16%	22 Feb →
poseidon	4–9	-0.02	24%	21 Feb →
poseidon	9–4	0.12	43%	21 Feb →
poseidon	2–9	-0.08	0%	21 Feb →
inferno	13–1	0.00	10%	21 Feb →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	24%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.01	17%	21 Feb →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	14%	21 Feb →
mirage	8–2	0.01	21%	21 Feb →
inferno	0–13	-0.08	27%	21 Feb →
nuke	7–2	0.16	18%	21 Feb →
poseidon	9–6	0.07	22%	21 Feb →
poseidon	8–8	-0.00	23%	21 Feb →
nuke	16–13	0.06	13%	20 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.03	21%	20 Feb →
inferno	6–9	-0.05	24%	13 Feb →
poseidon	9–3	-0.02	33%	13 Feb →
poseidon	9–7	0.02	26%	13 Feb →
poseidon	9–2	-0.09	15%	13 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	11 Feb →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	32%	11 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	15%	11 Feb →