kennyyy — CS2 Stats

76561198054535170[U:1:94269442]

500Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,566Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2053 of 8156 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkennyyyFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,566 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning40
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression3.4
Utility3.9
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.0
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time612ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — overpass 13–5
131Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 55% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35171849%-0.01
infernoA22121055%-0.00
ancientB137654%-0.01
overpassC94544%-0.01
anubisD93633%-0.01
dust2B63350%-0.00
nuke42250%-0.01
cache21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

583Matches
54%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
67.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3954%1.0013.8
Inferno3453%0.9714.7
Ancient2752%0.9413.6
Anubis2548%1.0415.1
Overpass743%1.0012.6
Nuke425%0.7415.8
Dust2333%0.6510.0
Cache1100%0.5010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
607msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.02HE damage / grenade
5.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3934 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9172% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0913%13 May
inferno13–5-0.0320%6 May
inferno13–100.0115%6 May
mirage1–13-0.0929%6 May
inferno13–8-0.0221%6 May
overpass5–13-0.0818%5 May
mirage13–8-0.0525%5 May
mirage13–110.0224%5 May
cache9–13-0.0132%3 May
overpass13–50.0026%2 May
mirage13–5-0.0625%2 May
mirage8–13-0.0414%1 May
anubis16–12-0.0326%1 May
inferno13–80.0216%1 May
inferno9–13-0.027%1 May
mirage13–80.0229%1 May
mirage13–10-0.0410%30 Apr
cache16–13-0.0626%29 Apr
nuke13–90.0118%29 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0921%27 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0115%27 Apr
mirage13–50.0332%27 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0315%27 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0113%27 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0410%27 Apr
ancient13–30.058%26 Apr
overpass9–130.0020%26 Apr
inferno11–130.0327%26 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0230%26 Apr
inferno13–160.0123%24 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0413%24 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0513%22 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0318%22 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0220%22 Apr
anubis13–80.0019%22 Apr
inferno13–70.0922%22 Apr
dust213–11-0.0318%22 Apr
mirage13–50.0316%22 Apr
inferno0–6-0.0525%22 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0410%18 Apr
dust26–130.0122%17 Apr
overpass5–130.0219%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0416%17 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0028%17 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0222%17 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0419%15 Apr
dust28–13-0.0322%15 Apr
anubis13–50.0718%15 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0534%30 Mar
mirage9–130.0418%29 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0714%29 Mar
mirage13–40.0217%29 Mar
ancient13–110.0125%29 Mar
inferno13–30.0324%28 Mar
ancient13–110.0019%28 Mar
ancient12–120.0924%28 Mar
mirage6–130.023%27 Mar
dust213–100.0322%27 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0330%25 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0322%24 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0629%24 Feb
ancient13–100.0336%24 Feb
mirage8–130.0228%21 Feb
inferno13–90.0024%21 Feb
inferno13–90.0230%21 Feb
dust213–7-0.0017%21 Feb
mirage13–50.0123%21 Feb
mirage5–130.0126%20 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0318%20 Feb
inferno13–80.0314%20 Feb
mirage13–70.0624%20 Feb
inferno7–130.0124%19 Feb
dust28–130.0238%19 Feb
mirage16–140.0219%19 Feb
mirage13–80.0021%19 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0117%19 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0921%19 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0140%19 Feb
nuke13–70.0020%19 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0420%18 Feb
mirage10–130.0024%18 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0630%18 Feb
overpass13–100.0034%18 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0228%18 Feb
ancient13–1-0.0318%18 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0033%16 Feb
inferno13–10.0421%15 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0031%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0426%15 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0125%15 Feb
overpass13–50.1029%14 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0621%13 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0515%13 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0428%12 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0230%12 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0029%12 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0112%5 Feb
nuke7–130.0114%5 Feb
inferno10–130.0420%19 Dec
anubis11–130.0317%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →