Pater Pen

Pater Pen — CS2 Stats

76561199130746766[U:1:1170481038]Steam profile ↗

1,078Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,278Purple band · top ~23.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6593 of 10714 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPater PenFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER16,278 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning47
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.7
Utility6.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 95% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.7
Utility6.7
Mechanics9.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time659ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–9
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
138In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 25anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25151060%-0.01
infernoB23121152%-0.01
ancientA2012860%0.00
dust2C146843%-0.03
anubisC83538%-0.02
nukeB63350%0.00
cache110100%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.06
train1010%-0.06
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

802Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
72.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16153%1.0414.3
Inferno13646%1.0714.8
Ancient12659%1.1714.8
Anubis5441%1.1114.3
Nuke5358%1.0315.1
Dust23644%0.9112.8
Vertigo1233%0.9411.7
Overpass650%1.3517.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
94.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
658msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
30.9%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
11.56HE damage / grenade
10.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.9144% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–13-0.0322%29 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0116%29 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0422%28 Apr
inferno19–17-0.0122%28 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0519%27 Apr
inferno13–50.0117%27 Apr
ancient13–30.1033%26 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0610%17 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0329%17 Apr
ancient13–70.0333%17 Apr
ancient9–130.0427%15 Apr
dust28–13-0.0420%15 Apr
anubis13–5-0.0518%15 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0319%12 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0621%12 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0820%30 Mar
mirage13–40.0120%29 Mar
ancient13–110.0121%29 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0111%28 Mar
ancient12–12-0.0724%28 Mar
inferno1–13-0.0217%24 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0833%16 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0529%14 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0413%13 Mar
dust210–13-0.0117%13 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0424%12 Mar
dust213–5-0.0330%12 Mar
dust211–13-0.0724%12 Mar
mirage16–19-0.0119%12 Mar
mirage13–100.0219%11 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0120%11 Mar
inferno13–50.0217%11 Mar
ancient13–50.1021%11 Mar
dust213–90.0029%11 Mar
dust26–13-0.0331%11 Mar
dust213–110.0228%11 Mar
dust216–120.0220%11 Mar
mirage13–30.0318%10 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0129%10 Mar
mirage3–130.0131%10 Mar
mirage11–130.0525%10 Mar
inferno13–110.0520%8 Mar
dust26–13-0.0320%6 Mar
anubis2–130.0043%5 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0525%5 Mar
dust22–13-0.057%5 Mar
inferno13–80.0427%3 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0317%26 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0325%26 Feb
inferno9–6-0.0722%26 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0456%26 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0311%25 Feb
nuke13–20.1126%25 Feb
ancient16–130.0520%25 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0226%25 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0324%24 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0423%24 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0213%24 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0327%24 Feb
mirage13–10.0417%23 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0018%23 Feb
dust24–13-0.0520%23 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0013%22 Feb
ancient7–130.0425%22 Feb
dust213–90.0521%14 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0314%20 Dec
inferno19–16-0.0320%18 Dec
anubis7–13-0.0316%17 Dec
mirage13–60.0733%17 Dec
ancient16–140.0022%17 Dec
nuke16–130.0418%16 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0319%16 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0421%15 Dec
dust213–11-0.0620%10 Dec
train2–13-0.0613%4 Dec
ancient12–16-0.0511%30 Nov
inferno13–11-0.0124%30 Nov
mirage12–1-0.0113%29 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0513%29 Nov
office3–13-0.0633%29 Nov
dust212–12-0.0721%29 Nov
inferno13–100.0024%26 Nov
ancient13–60.0012%26 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0425%21 Nov
inferno13–40.0920%21 Nov
ancient13–4-0.0113%21 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0334%21 Nov
inferno17–190.0115%18 Nov
mirage14–16-0.0412%18 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0117%17 Nov
anubis9–130.0720%17 Nov
mirage13–90.1216%16 Nov
ancient13–10-0.008%15 Nov
nuke7–13-0.0723%15 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0419%12 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0311%12 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0323%11 Nov
inferno7–13-0.056%11 Nov
anubis10–13-0.0615%11 Nov
anubis13–8-0.0122%4 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →