Detective Diggleton — CS2 Stats

76561198054113281[U:1:93847553]

1,035Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,287Purple band · top ~23.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7288 of 11885 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDetective DiggletonPREMIER16,287 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning44
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateLWWWWTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression6.2
Utility3.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.1

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 46% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.4
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time494ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 494ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%0.01
nukeC1871139%-0.01
infernoC156940%-0.01
dust2A148657%-0.00
ancientB136746%-0.00
anubisD93633%0.03
cacheB84450%0.03
vertigo110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo1100%0.9416.0
Mirage10%0.6511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
492msReaction time
46.3%T opening success
30.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
2.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8822 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.5918% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.017%26 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0410%26 Aug
mirage13–9-0.029%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0013%24 Aug
ancient13–7-0.039%24 Aug
nuke15–150.0416%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0113%24 Aug
dust213–9-0.0120%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0413%24 Aug
dust25–130.0142%24 Aug
mirage13–00.0110%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1110%24 Aug
ancient13–70.0513%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0136%22 Aug
inferno2–13-0.068%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0321%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0516%19 Aug
dust216–130.0211%19 Aug
mirage13–50.0420%18 Aug
inferno13–40.0616%18 Aug
ancient1–6-0.038%18 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0410%18 Aug
ancient10–13-0.016%18 Aug
dust213–5-0.0344%17 Aug
dust216–14-0.0420%17 Aug
mirage6–10.020%17 Aug
anubis13–70.0614%17 Aug
vertigo13–100.1110%17 Aug
ancient13–90.0413%15 Aug
inferno13–10-0.019%15 Aug
dust214–16-0.0517%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.0116%15 Aug
nuke13–90.036%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0718%12 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0415%12 Aug
inferno13–16-0.046%12 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0111%11 Aug
dust211–130.0011%11 Aug
cache13–40.1414%11 Aug
anubis4–130.0417%11 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0315%11 Aug
mirage11–130.0112%10 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0719%10 Aug
ancient4–13-0.068%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0111%9 Aug
nuke8–130.0410%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0113%9 Aug
mirage13–20.1022%9 Aug
nuke13–100.008%8 Aug
inferno13–90.018%5 Aug
nuke13–8-0.038%5 Aug
cache13–2-0.014%5 Aug
nuke7–130.0212%5 Aug
anubis13–80.0210%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0613%4 Aug
ancient8–130.0212%4 Aug
inferno13–110.0312%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.019%3 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0011%3 Aug
dust213–100.0111%3 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0215%3 Aug
dust213–60.1323%3 Aug
dust215–15-0.067%29 Jul
dust213–10-0.0114%29 Jul
anubis15–150.0514%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0111%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0013%28 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0616%28 Jul
mirage9–13-0.084%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0311%27 Jul
cache8–13-0.0212%27 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0818%27 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0912%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.063%27 Jul
dust215–150.0217%27 Jul
cache13–40.1224%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0422%21 Jul
cache2–90.0432%21 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0516%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0613%21 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0313%20 Jul
mirage13–90.0723%20 Jul
mirage15–150.0110%20 Jul
cache13–10.019%20 Jul
cache8–13-0.0216%20 Jul
mirage13–70.119%15 Jul
inferno13–40.0010%13 Jul
nuke0–4-0.0229%4 Jul
nuke13–60.0614%4 Jul
cache8–130.0222%4 Jul
anubis10–130.1212%4 Jul
mirage6–130.0014%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0416%3 Jul
ancient13–70.0618%16 Jun
nuke13–80.1018%16 Jun
anubis10–20.1014%16 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0411%8 Jun
mirage3–13-0.1011%8 Jun
anubis10–13-0.029%7 Jun
dust213–80.0118%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →