arioK — CS2 Stats

76561198052703719[U:1:92437991]✓ No bans

278Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,384Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,185Purple band · top ~19.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9012 of 15601 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate41.0%48.1%7.1% short
Shot accuracy18.6%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.08above
Match win rate42.9%46.5%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGarioKPREMIER17,185 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning45
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateWLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.9
Utility5.7
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time654ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–6
132Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22111150%-0.01
nukeB20101050%-0.00
ancientS1510567%-0.00
dust2A148657%-0.00
infernoA138562%0.01
overpassS65183%0.02
anubisD61517%-0.07
office21150%0.01
grail1010%-0.06
train110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,104Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
1,892Matches
42.9%Match win rate
41.0%Headshot %
18.6%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
3,463MVPs
984Hours (in match)
1,123Bombs planted
337Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,364dust2
2,236inferno
1,420nuke
338cbble
268train
81aztec
69lake
53dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
655msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.49HE damage / grenade
6.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9899% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.6286% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0215%16 May
dust22–13-0.0616%14 May
dust214–160.0116%14 May
nuke13–10-0.0827%14 May
dust213–40.0411%9 May
inferno14–16-0.0114%9 May
nuke4–11-0.0215%9 May
overpass16–12-0.0315%5 May
dust213–60.1222%5 May
ancient13–70.1211%5 May
ancient5–13-0.0819%3 May
dust28–13-0.0411%3 May
ancient13–6-0.0514%3 May
inferno10–13-0.038%28 Apr
mirage12–16-0.055%28 Apr
nuke13–50.0326%28 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0328%6 Apr
dust213–5-0.0317%5 Apr
ancient13–80.0116%5 Apr
overpass13–80.0522%5 Apr
anubis5–13-0.065%5 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0215%3 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0612%3 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0413%3 Apr
mirage10–13-0.029%25 Jan
ancient13–16-0.048%25 Aug
mirage4–100.0217%25 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0320%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0519%20 Jul
dust213–110.0113%20 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0416%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0818%19 Jul
overpass13–50.065%17 Jul
overpass16–14-0.0110%17 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0321%12 Jul
ancient13–10-0.008%10 Jul
mirage13–100.0117%9 Jul
ancient0–9-0.0616%6 Jul
anubis11–13-0.1510%6 Jul
dust213–60.0115%6 Jul
mirage13–10-0.065%6 Jul
dust28–13-0.0316%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0113%5 Jul
anubis13–40.026%5 Jul
grail7–13-0.0612%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0412%5 Jul
dust25–13-0.0413%5 Jul
mirage13–70.024%4 Jul
ancient13–60.0117%4 Jul
office10–13-0.0419%4 Jul
overpass13–50.0829%4 Jul
inferno8–130.0118%23 Jun
inferno6–130.0011%22 Jun
nuke3–130.0129%22 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0910%21 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0417%20 Jun
nuke8–8-0.037%20 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0213%20 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0719%5 Jun
train13–110.0515%4 Jun
inferno13–100.0216%3 Jun
ancient13–90.0221%3 Jun
inferno13–8-0.017%2 Jun
nuke16–120.0112%2 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0718%1 Jun
mirage16–140.0416%1 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0711%1 Jun
nuke13–60.0422%1 Jun
mirage11–13-0.057%27 May
ancient13–80.0612%27 May
dust213–16-0.0620%27 May
nuke13–8-0.0316%26 May
ancient13–100.0321%26 May
nuke13–60.0412%25 May
anubis5–13-0.0514%25 May
ancient8–130.0219%25 May
mirage13–60.0210%25 May
mirage7–13-0.0419%25 May
nuke13–60.0335%18 May
nuke13–20.0817%18 May
office13–70.0631%18 May
nuke16–13-0.0410%17 May
inferno13–11-0.0312%17 May
nuke3–130.0913%12 May
nuke11–13-0.0217%12 May
ancient13–6-0.027%11 May
mirage13–50.0119%11 May
dust216–140.0118%11 May
inferno13–110.0619%10 May
anubis7–13-0.106%10 May
mirage0–80.037%10 May
nuke11–130.0116%10 May
mirage13–60.0410%10 May
mirage16–120.0322%9 May
inferno13–60.0510%7 May
dust216–120.0410%5 May
ancient13–60.008%5 May
mirage15–15-0.057%5 May
dust213–60.0012%5 May
nuke16–120.0113%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →