Valleritt ™

Valleritt ™ — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198049534076[U:1:89268348]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,220Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,147Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating13,901Blue band · top ~34.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12616 of 18774 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGValleritt ™PREMIER13,901 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning56
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49465Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression6.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time554ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–0
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2191243%0.01
dust2A1911858%0.02
ancientC1661038%0.01
infernoB126650%0.02
nukeC125742%0.02
anubisA127558%0.01
cacheS75271%0.05
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,584Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
4,083Matches
32.9%Match win rate
37.2%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
7,281MVPs
2,147Hours (in match)
3,556Bombs planted
818Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,537
AWP17,412
P903,821
UMP-452,143
MP92,126
MP71,581

Lifetime map wins

10,538dust2
3,387inferno
2,101nuke
1,032vertigo
475train
279cbble
80office
62assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
65.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
559msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
5.46HE damage / grenade
6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.034%11 Aug
inferno11–130.0215%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0220%11 Aug
dust213–100.056%11 Aug
mirage8–130.0414%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0124%11 Aug
inferno10–130.0115%3 Aug
cache15–150.0815%2 Aug
mirage13–90.0815%30 Jul
mirage8–130.0828%30 Jul
nuke13–40.0817%30 Jul
cache13–100.0318%30 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0212%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0324%29 Jul
anubis16–140.0410%26 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0114%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0011%25 Jul
dust213–80.0016%25 Jul
anubis13–70.0519%25 Jul
cache13–50.0126%25 Jul
ancient11–130.0117%25 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0120%25 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0316%25 Jul
inferno13–40.0415%25 Jul
dust213–50.1013%25 Jul
mirage13–90.016%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0219%24 Jul
dust211–130.0314%24 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0417%24 Jul
nuke4–130.0310%24 Jul
dust213–80.0617%22 Jul
dust23–130.0319%22 Jul
ancient12–16-0.028%22 Jul
dust23–13-0.0510%20 Jul
mirage13–50.1013%20 Jul
cache13–10-0.0320%20 Jul
nuke13–00.1421%20 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0210%20 Jul
inferno13–20.0620%19 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0011%18 Jul
anubis9–130.0113%17 Jul
dust27–130.0115%17 Jul
cache13–90.0815%11 Jul
ancient9–130.0112%11 Jul
anubis12–160.088%11 Jul
dust213–10.0741%3 Jul
cache13–50.0515%3 Jul
dust213–9-0.0916%25 Jun
dust213–70.0914%25 Jun
ancient8–130.0411%25 Jun
anubis6–13-0.037%24 Jun
cache11–130.0914%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0930%22 Jun
dust210–13-0.0118%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0012%21 Jun
mirage4–130.0220%20 Jun
ancient13–50.0924%19 Jun
inferno16–140.0116%19 Jun
dust24–13-0.0426%19 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0113%19 Jun
nuke1–13-0.096%14 Jun
anubis13–8-0.088%14 Jun
nuke13–110.0318%14 Jun
anubis13–30.0620%14 Jun
dust210–130.0621%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0117%13 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0415%13 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0214%13 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0216%13 Jun
mirage13–90.087%8 Jun
ancient3–130.0011%8 Jun
nuke15–150.0617%4 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0118%31 May
dust213–90.0520%30 May
anubis13–6-0.004%30 May
dust213–100.0510%30 May
ancient13–9-0.015%30 May
nuke13–100.0520%30 May
inferno15–150.0516%29 May
dust213–4-0.0212%29 May
nuke15–15-0.0121%29 May
mirage13–110.0117%29 May
dust213–90.058%29 May
nuke15–15-0.0621%24 May
nuke2–130.0314%23 May
dust23–13-0.1114%17 May
ancient5–130.0318%17 May
ancient11–130.0410%16 May
mirage7–130.0811%16 May
anubis16–140.0010%16 May
inferno13–90.028%16 May
inferno13–160.0711%15 May
ancient13–00.106%13 May
mirage6–13-0.058%13 May
mirage8–13-0.0016%11 May
inferno13–110.007%10 May
overpass5–13-0.0519%10 May
mirage13–160.0111%10 May
inferno9–13-0.0215%3 May
ancient0–6-0.060%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →