Manke — CS2 Stats

76561198047818226[U:1:87552498]

1,268Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,897Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,644Purple band · top ~13.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24317 of 53337 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.6%44.7%46.1%8.4% short
Shot accuracy14.4%11.9%12.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.041.050.07 short
Match win rate46.6%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMankeFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,644 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning61
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateLLWWTLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5
Aggression9.7
Utility6.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time645ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–9
132Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31141745%0.01
dust2B1991047%0.01
ancientA1610663%0.02
infernoS1511473%0.06
nukeB63350%0.01
anubisD51420%0.01
overpassA53260%-0.00
cache32167%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,761Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
5,008Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
37.6%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
9,412MVPs
1,897Hours (in match)
4,387Bombs planted
1,255Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,223inferno
5,396dust2
1,387nuke
617vertigo
541train
177cbble
84office
29dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

199Matches
48%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
86.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5056%1.1717.2
Dust22638%1.1415.2
Ancient2471%1.3519.6
Inferno2343%1.2117.2
Anubis1346%1.1017.6
Nuke650%1.3116.7
Train250%0.8616.5
Overpass250%0.7415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
643msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
58.1%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
7.76HE damage / grenade
14.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.037%25 Aug
mirage3–130.088%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0213%18 Aug
cache13–5-0.0510%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0318%15 Aug
anubis10–130.0523%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0811%11 Aug
dust213–6-0.0514%10 Aug
mirage13–30.1023%10 Aug
ancient13–160.0218%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0120%7 Aug
nuke9–1-0.0125%7 Aug
mirage14–160.0314%7 Aug
inferno13–40.0125%6 Aug
cache16–140.0219%6 Aug
dust213–110.0623%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0219%5 Aug
mirage8–130.0124%1 Aug
ancient13–30.0915%31 Jul
mirage13–50.0212%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0214%30 Jul
dust211–130.0212%23 Jul
cache14–160.0411%14 Jul
inferno11–130.0626%25 Jun
inferno13–60.1325%20 Jun
ancient13–80.0323%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0124%3 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0422%2 Jun
anubis13–160.0511%1 Jun
inferno13–70.0816%31 May
inferno4–130.0414%30 May
dust213–50.1117%30 May
mirage13–8-0.0113%30 May
mirage13–10-0.0011%30 May
overpass13–40.0515%28 May
dust24–130.0222%27 May
anubis7–130.0519%27 May
mirage7–13-0.0315%25 May
ancient13–80.0719%25 May
inferno13–20.1212%25 May
mirage13–90.1714%24 May
mirage13–80.0112%24 May
inferno13–110.0715%10 May
ancient13–110.0217%10 May
mirage12–16-0.0110%18 Apr
ancient13–70.0113%18 Apr
ancient6–130.0122%15 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0518%14 Apr
inferno8–130.0110%14 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0216%13 Apr
inferno7–130.0812%13 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0913%12 Apr
ancient13–100.0214%12 Apr
overpass13–10-0.004%11 Apr
dust29–130.0216%11 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0115%11 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0014%11 Apr
dust213–50.0411%10 Apr
nuke13–70.037%8 Apr
ancient6–130.0516%8 Apr
inferno13–70.0211%6 Apr
inferno13–100.0915%6 Apr
dust213–40.0820%5 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0428%5 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0612%5 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0014%4 Apr
dust213–80.1127%4 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0610%3 Apr
mirage14–160.0012%3 Apr
ancient13–100.0421%3 Apr
dust26–13-0.1014%3 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0220%3 Apr
dust24–130.0022%3 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0114%2 Apr
dust28–13-0.015%2 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0312%1 Apr
overpass13–90.0213%31 Mar
overpass1–8-0.0314%31 Mar
nuke13–110.0233%30 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0219%29 Mar
nuke10–13-0.026%28 Mar
dust213–80.0316%28 Mar
dust20–9-0.0515%27 Mar
ancient10–130.0215%27 Mar
inferno13–50.1030%26 Mar
dust27–13-0.016%25 Mar
dust216–14-0.0211%25 Mar
mirage9–130.0713%24 Mar
mirage13–90.005%24 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0613%24 Mar
inferno13–90.0716%23 Mar
mirage13–90.1218%22 Mar
nuke11–130.0811%22 Mar
mirage15–150.0313%22 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0213%22 Mar
mirage13–70.1416%21 Mar
dust213–80.0313%21 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0511%20 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0213%19 Mar
inferno13–70.0810%19 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →