Zoogie

Zoogie — CS2 Stats

AU76561198045204790[U:1:84939062]Steam profile ↗

1,258Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,456Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 Developing
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.1%42.5%44.2%5.1% short
Shot accuracy16.9%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.090.991.04above
Match win rate43.7%44.2%45.3%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZoogieFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning54
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateTLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression5.3
Utility5.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time630ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 731ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213959%0.01
mirageB168850%0.00
overpassA148657%-0.00
dust2B136746%0.02
infernoC125742%-0.01
ancientB84450%-0.01
anubisD62433%-0.01
cacheS54180%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.08
office1010%-0.05
train1010%0.02
agency1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,189Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,861Matches
43.7%Match win rate
39.1%Headshot %
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
10,296MVPs
2,142Hours (in match)
5,360Bombs planted
1,470Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

16,620dust2
6,748inferno
2,078nuke
1,825train
699cbble
602vertigo
147office
62bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
633msReaction time
43.7%T opening success
34.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
9.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.6356% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–12-0.0225%22 Aug
mirage5–130.017%22 Aug
cache6–13-0.0416%28 Jul
cache13–60.0529%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0810%27 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0119%19 Jul
cache13–90.0018%17 Jul
nuke13–70.0028%17 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0831%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0215%16 Jul
cache13–30.0315%12 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0126%12 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0622%12 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0311%12 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0614%12 Jun
dust213–70.0518%9 Jun
nuke13–90.029%9 Jun
ancient9–130.0115%8 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0321%8 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0115%8 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0113%8 Jun
dust213–70.0916%7 Jun
inferno13–70.0413%7 Jun
overpass16–130.0522%6 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0412%6 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0319%6 Jun
nuke7–130.0514%5 Jun
anubis13–30.1821%5 Jun
mirage11–130.0323%5 Jun
inferno13–110.0719%5 Jun
dust213–1-0.0132%5 Jun
dust211–130.0616%4 Jun
nuke9–130.0419%4 Jun
overpass13–110.1313%3 Jun
mirage13–20.1514%3 Jun
inferno16–140.0210%3 Jun
nuke13–100.0112%3 Jun
nuke13–20.0720%2 Jun
overpass13–100.0016%2 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0424%2 Jun
dust25–13-0.0113%2 Jun
nuke13–90.0219%2 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0514%25 May
dust27–130.0032%25 May
ancient13–4-0.027%15 May
anubis11–13-0.065%13 May
mirage14–16-0.0018%13 May
mirage13–7-0.007%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0510%12 May
ancient9–13-0.0336%12 May
nuke7–13-0.0722%10 May
cache7–10.0050%29 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0420%28 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0422%12 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0322%12 Apr
dust27–13-0.0417%12 Apr
dust213–16-0.0016%22 Feb
mirage13–60.0427%22 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0213%10 Feb
dust213–10-0.0223%6 Feb
mirage16–130.0535%6 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0215%6 Feb
overpass0–13-0.0430%5 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0031%5 Feb
overpass16–130.0135%4 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0410%3 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0213%3 Feb
dust210–13-0.0030%3 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0420%3 Feb
overpass13–16-0.0225%3 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0110%2 Feb
dust213–40.1218%2 Feb
overpass13–40.0921%1 Feb
nuke16–12-0.0316%1 Feb
nuke13–80.0621%31 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0311%31 Jan
inferno13–160.0215%28 Jan
nuke5–130.0219%28 Jan
overpass16–130.0214%25 Jan
nuke13–70.0323%25 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0419%25 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0315%25 Jan
dust216–13-0.0316%23 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0024%23 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0320%23 Jan
overpass4–13-0.1212%19 Jan
nuke13–100.0413%19 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0421%18 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0228%16 Jan
ancient11–130.0622%16 Jan
office2–13-0.0524%25 Dec
inferno13–5-0.0113%25 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0421%25 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0219%25 Dec
train12–120.0228%25 Dec
ancient13–8-0.0218%25 Dec
agency8–13-0.0631%24 Dec
dust23–130.0128%24 Dec
ancient3–13-0.0524%24 Dec
nuke13–110.0917%13 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →