不Dave不爱

不Dave不爱 — CS2 Stats

76561198045061158[U:1:84795430]Steam profile ↗

753Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,399Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating21,082Pink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6947 of 18502 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG不Dave不爱FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,082 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning37
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.6
Aggression3.6
Utility6.6
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning3.7
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time616ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1211In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26131350%-0.01
mirageA25141156%-0.03
infernoB178947%-0.03
nukeB147750%-0.02
overpassA85363%-0.03
cache440100%0.01
ancient31233%-0.04
anubis21150%-0.02
train110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,716Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
4,908Matches
41.2%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
8,687MVPs
2,331Hours (in match)
5,320Bombs planted
1,048Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,930
AWP5,699
P2502,528
P901,690
Tec-91,507

Lifetime map wins

12,537dust2
7,724inferno
1,460nuke
1,267cbble
866train
146vertigo
63office
22aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

440Matches
51%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
57.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2055%0.7611.9
Inferno875%0.8413.0
Dust2838%0.638.3
Anubis633%0.588.8
Overpass475%0.7211.5
Nuke367%0.9411.0
Ancient10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
24.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.6%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
608msReaction time
18.5%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
11.98HE damage / grenade
7.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.5383% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0140%21 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0412%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0623%20 Aug
mirage13–6-0.028%20 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0125%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0411%20 Aug
inferno13–00.1014%19 Aug
dust213–30.1029%19 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0315%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0125%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0022%19 Aug
cache13–90.0429%3 Aug
dust212–16-0.0324%3 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0418%3 Aug
cache13–60.0111%20 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0221%20 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0118%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0417%24 Jun
dust213–70.0716%23 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0717%23 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0810%23 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0114%12 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0110%12 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0713%12 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0417%23 May
mirage13–7-0.0211%23 May
dust215–15-0.0714%23 May
inferno13–11-0.0016%23 May
nuke13–11-0.0227%21 May
mirage11–13-0.0618%21 May
dust211–13-0.0218%1 May
cache13–6-0.0127%1 May
cache13–50.0112%29 Apr
dust211–130.0024%1 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0913%1 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0225%23 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0513%23 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0911%22 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0623%22 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0232%22 Feb
dust29–130.0122%22 Feb
dust213–70.0632%18 Feb
dust213–11-0.0118%17 Feb
inferno13–20.0325%23 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0214%15 Jan
mirage13–30.0614%30 Dec
dust213–11-0.0321%27 Dec
mirage0–7-0.0543%27 Dec
inferno13–1-0.0310%27 Dec
inferno3–13-0.0614%19 Dec
nuke13–6-0.0323%19 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0710%19 Dec
overpass13–100.0315%18 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0718%18 Dec
ancient13–20.0030%17 Dec
dust213–10.0123%17 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0321%17 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0714%17 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0518%16 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0426%16 Dec
dust213–6-0.0130%16 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0322%16 Dec
dust213–8-0.0415%16 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0515%12 Dec
mirage14–16-0.0223%12 Dec
inferno13–10-0.008%12 Dec
dust25–13-0.1016%12 Dec
nuke13–8-0.0017%12 Dec
inferno5–13-0.1010%11 Dec
dust214–16-0.1118%11 Dec
nuke13–11-0.053%6 Dec
mirage13–70.0413%6 Dec
dust210–13-0.0214%6 Dec
overpass16–14-0.0715%6 Dec
mirage1–13-0.0715%6 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0512%3 Dec
dust27–13-0.0119%3 Dec
inferno13–40.0319%3 Dec
nuke13–40.0310%1 Dec
mirage16–130.0220%1 Dec
dust213–6-0.0414%1 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0116%27 Nov
nuke8–00.0021%27 Nov
inferno7–13-0.0725%27 Nov
dust213–20.0315%26 Nov
train16–12-0.0211%26 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0013%26 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0413%26 Nov
overpass13–6-0.0118%26 Nov
overpass7–13-0.049%26 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0614%26 Nov
dust25–13-0.0026%26 Nov
overpass8–13-0.0710%25 Nov
dust213–7-0.0325%25 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0225%25 Nov
mirage2–13-0.0813%25 Nov
overpass11–13-0.0221%24 Nov
mirage16–14-0.0317%22 Nov
nuke9–13-0.0028%22 Nov
dust213–6-0.0118%22 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →