beefkit

beefkit — CS2 Stats

US76561198041672079[U:1:81406351]Steam profile ↗

903Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,948Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating16,506Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17081 of 29814 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.5%44.2%44.9%3.4% short
Shot accuracy15.7%11.2%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.041.04above
Match win rate53.9%45.3%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbeefkitFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,506 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning44
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49447Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression3.7
Utility5.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time577ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30121840%-0.00
dust2B179853%0.01
nukeC135838%-0.00
ancientA106460%0.00
infernoA106460%-0.01
cacheC94544%-0.02
anubisB63350%-0.01
overpass440100%0.04
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,209Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
4,967Matches
53.9%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
41.5%Headshot %
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
10,769MVPs
1,742Hours (in match)
3,025Bombs planted
927Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,083
AWP20,492
UMP-452,636
P2501,900
Knife1,270
MP91,092

Lifetime map wins

2,833inferno
2,522dust2
2,520office
1,932nuke
1,339vertigo
456train
329cbble
150italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
574msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
12.27HE damage / grenade
4.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0217%27 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0523%25 Aug
ancient16–120.0211%24 Aug
dust213–50.0223%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0322%18 Aug
cache10–13-0.028%18 Aug
cache3–13-0.0513%18 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0114%17 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0813%16 Aug
nuke15–15-0.026%16 Aug
dust213–70.0820%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0518%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0412%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0217%13 Aug
anubis15–150.0211%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0214%11 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0218%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.049%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.079%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0210%9 Aug
inferno13–2-0.027%9 Aug
cache13–100.0122%6 Aug
dust213–70.0519%5 Aug
ancient8–130.0129%5 Aug
nuke13–3-0.023%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0415%4 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0420%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0114%2 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0910%1 Aug
cache13–11-0.0127%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0213%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0013%29 Jul
dust21–13-0.0611%29 Jul
nuke13–60.0422%29 Jul
office4–13-0.0129%28 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0318%28 Jul
anubis8–13-0.057%26 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0222%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.079%25 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0616%24 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0117%24 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0016%24 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0117%24 Jul
cache13–9-0.0125%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.0420%23 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0411%22 Jul
dust213–60.0514%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0621%21 Jul
nuke11–130.039%20 Jul
dust213–80.1224%19 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0130%17 Jul
mirage3–13-0.050%14 Jul
cache13–80.0125%10 Jul
inferno13–70.038%4 Jul
dust215–15-0.0511%4 Jul
dust213–100.0810%4 Jul
dust20–130.0125%4 Jul
dust216–14-0.0310%2 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0520%2 Jul
ancient9–130.0026%1 Jul
ancient13–90.0323%30 Jun
inferno13–70.0826%30 Jun
dust216–140.0319%29 Jun
overpass13–60.0115%27 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0122%25 Jun
anubis13–20.0626%24 Jun
mirage13–70.0013%24 Jun
overpass16–140.068%24 Jun
mirage13–50.0613%24 Jun
mirage11–130.0041%23 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0122%20 Jun
nuke13–110.0716%19 Jun
nuke15–150.0011%18 Jun
overpass13–80.0523%17 Jun
mirage13–30.1527%17 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0413%2 Jun
nuke11–130.0230%30 May
ancient13–100.0820%27 May
mirage13–110.0616%20 May
nuke7–13-0.0519%13 May
mirage15–150.0322%12 May
mirage5–13-0.0017%12 May
overpass13–50.0210%11 May
dust213–50.0316%11 May
dust214–16-0.0122%9 May
nuke8–13-0.0524%6 May
mirage11–13-0.0331%5 May
dust26–13-0.0520%5 May
mirage13–90.0525%5 May
inferno13–100.0231%5 May
nuke13–8-0.0111%2 May
nuke10–130.0015%1 May
dust211–13-0.0810%1 May
mirage15–150.0316%1 May
ancient14–160.0112%30 Apr
dust28–130.0417%30 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0317%30 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0413%30 Apr
inferno13–100.0114%29 Apr
mirage16–140.038%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →