Sunny — CS2 Stats

FR76561198041665852[U:1:81400124]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,003Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,680Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13340 of 24817 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning55

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0

Aggression6.3

Utility4.9

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.3

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.5

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time581ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms

Headshot accuracy31.3%+7.7%

first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 31.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

9Longest win streak

7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	17–15	53%	0.03
cache	B	24	13–11	54%	0.01
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.00
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.03
dust2	D	9	3–6	33%	0.00
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches

53%Win rate

1.29Avg K/D

—ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	3	33%	0.58	7.7
Inferno	2	100%	1.04	16.5
Nuke	1	0%	0.87	13.0
Mirage	1	0%	1.07	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.5%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

78.4%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

588msReaction time

34.1%T opening success

44.5%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

11.67HE damage / grenade

11.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4984 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.08% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	0.02	42%	29 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	28%	29 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	38%	27 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	26%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	30%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	52%	24 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.05	30%	24 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	41%	24 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	27%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	50%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	42%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	34%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	44%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	32%	23 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.02	29%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.09	23%	23 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.01	33%	23 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	44%	23 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.04	38%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	32%	23 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.12	36%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	21%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	35%	22 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	27%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.12	27%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.01	30%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	20%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	21%	22 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.01	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	18%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	12%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	35%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	24%	18 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.01	22%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	10%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	30%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	21%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.03	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.07	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	30%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	30%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	26%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.03	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.00	29%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.07	30%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.08	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	23%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.09	20%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.03	33%	15 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.03	25%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.10	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.25	23%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	17%	13 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.02	38%	12 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	28%	12 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	14%	12 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.08	18%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.01	24%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	16%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	23%	10 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.05	30%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	18%	10 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	14%	9 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.05	20%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.06	23%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.06	28%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.11	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.11	22%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	14%	8 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.12	33%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	33%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.10	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	23%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	29%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.07	32%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	27%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.11	26%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	18%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.06	25%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.11	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	23%	7 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	39%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	25%	7 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	28%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	27%	7 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	23%	7 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	11%	7 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	20%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	21%	7 Aug →