gioia — CS2 Stats

76561198036943350[U:1:76677622]✓ No bans

789Tracked matches68%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,052Pink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7136 of 16228 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgioiaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,052 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning69
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60364Last 10060%Win rateLLWWLLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression9.4
Utility2.9
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.9
Utility2.9
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time583ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 82% over 17anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2112957%0.03
mirageS1714382%0.03
dust2S1510567%0.04
anubisC146843%0.01
ancientA148657%0.01
nukeC94544%0.02
cacheA53260%-0.00
overpassA53260%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
56%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
77.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2580%1.0014.0
Nuke560%1.1318.6
Overpass475%0.989.5
Ancient367%0.9213.7
Train333%0.8612.7
Mirage367%1.1416.3
Inferno30%1.0415.0
Anubis10%0.678.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
584msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.75HE damage / grenade
3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2508 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0928%28 Aug
inferno7–130.0614%28 Aug
mirage16–130.0211%22 Aug
anubis13–1-0.0115%22 Aug
anubis7–13-0.019%17 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0514%17 Aug
dust213–70.0219%16 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0316%16 Aug
inferno13–60.1024%15 Aug
ancient15–150.0320%14 Aug
mirage9–2-0.0015%13 Aug
mirage13–70.1925%6 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0215%5 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0016%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0616%5 Aug
nuke8–130.0411%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.0225%24 Jul
dust216–140.0721%24 Jul
cache13–60.0318%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0519%23 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0113%23 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0219%21 Jul
inferno13–100.1017%21 Jul
dust213–90.0918%21 Jul
mirage13–110.0126%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0212%19 Jul
anubis6–130.026%16 Jul
cache13–6-0.0116%16 Jul
mirage13–80.1211%16 Jul
anubis13–30.049%13 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0319%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0219%12 Jul
inferno13–50.0113%12 Jul
ancient13–30.0715%12 Jul
cache10–130.019%12 Jul
nuke13–50.0310%12 Jul
inferno13–80.0217%12 Jul
dust213–40.2219%12 Jul
mirage5–0-0.0125%12 Jul
anubis13–70.1520%12 Jul
ancient5–130.0422%12 Jul
nuke14–160.0218%11 Jul
cache14–16-0.0510%11 Jul
dust213–80.1223%11 Jul
cache13–110.0110%9 Jul
dust213–70.0822%2 Jul
anubis13–110.027%2 Jul
inferno8–130.018%2 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0717%30 Jun
inferno13–40.0614%30 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0421%30 Jun
dust213–110.0012%29 Jun
nuke13–100.0219%29 Jun
inferno5–130.0318%29 Jun
dust23–13-0.0321%29 Jun
ancient13–70.0415%23 Jun
dust213–10-0.0621%23 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0117%22 Jun
inferno10–130.0222%22 Jun
inferno9–130.0512%22 Jun
nuke16–120.097%20 Jun
inferno13–80.079%20 Jun
anubis13–70.0711%20 Jun
nuke8–130.0412%20 Jun
ancient13–110.0520%18 Jun
ancient9–130.0313%18 Jun
dust29–130.0413%18 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0414%16 Jun
nuke13–40.0219%16 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0116%16 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0517%16 Jun
mirage16–130.0823%16 Jun
inferno13–30.0617%13 Jun
anubis13–40.048%13 Jun
ancient13–30.0526%13 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0015%13 Jun
overpass16–13-0.058%9 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0414%9 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0020%9 Jun
mirage13–90.0815%6 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0511%6 Jun
mirage13–11-0.016%4 Jun
ancient13–10-0.048%4 Jun
inferno13–90.0229%2 Jun
mirage13–40.0724%2 Jun
dust26–130.027%2 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0115%1 Jun
inferno16–13-0.006%1 Jun
ancient12–160.0219%1 Jun
inferno13–40.1110%1 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0010%30 May
anubis15–150.0511%30 May
mirage13–40.0420%30 May
nuke10–13-0.0418%29 May
overpass11–130.0312%29 May
mirage7–13-0.036%28 May
dust25–13-0.084%28 May
dust213–80.0419%28 May
mirage7–13-0.0312%28 May
inferno13–20.0813%28 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →