bchangg

bchangg — CS2 Stats

CA76561198035797804[U:1:75532076]Steam profile ↗

324Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,007Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,059Purple band · top ~28.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21480 of 35022 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate44.4%44.1%47.2%2.9% short
Shot accuracy16.0%11.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.090.14 short
Match win rate45.2%45.2%46.6%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbchanggPREMIER15,059 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning42
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52471Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression5.1
Utility6.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 21% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 698ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time703ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 737ms → last ⅓ avg 703ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — dust2 13–6
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 34ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A34211362%-0.00
mirageB24131154%-0.03
nukeC104640%-0.04
infernoB105550%-0.04
ancientD103730%-0.02
anubisB63350%-0.01
overpassB63350%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,470Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,299Matches
45.2%Match win rate
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
4,905MVPs
1,007Hours (in match)
2,242Bombs planted
561Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,000
AWP4,158
P901,673
P2501,484
UMP-451,409
Tec-91,064
MAG-71,012

Lifetime map wins

11,785dust2
2,755nuke
2,432inferno
112train
102office
74cbble
40vertigo
35aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
698msReaction time
47.5%T opening success
21.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
12.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 20.9657% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0711%27 Apr
dust213–9-0.0224%25 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0418%25 Apr
dust211–130.0223%25 Apr
dust27–13-0.0814%25 Apr
anubis7–13-0.059%25 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0413%23 Apr
dust213–11-0.0618%23 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0817%23 Apr
dust213–16-0.0322%23 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0321%23 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0216%23 Apr
dust216–130.0325%21 Apr
dust20–5-0.0650%21 Apr
mirage9–3-0.0315%21 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0027%21 Apr
dust213–70.0120%21 Apr
mirage13–100.0125%20 Apr
dust213–20.0325%19 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0434%19 Apr
dust29–13-0.0118%18 Apr
dust213–60.0115%14 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0321%14 Apr
anubis10–130.0319%14 Apr
mirage13–7-0.055%13 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0511%13 Apr
nuke13–110.0114%12 Apr
dust26–13-0.0315%12 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0113%12 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0311%12 Apr
dust213–60.0822%12 Apr
dust213–8-0.0015%12 Apr
dust28–13-0.0429%11 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0116%11 Apr
ancient13–70.016%11 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0828%11 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0418%11 Apr
dust213–80.0113%11 Apr
anubis13–50.0017%10 Apr
dust213–11-0.0223%10 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0214%10 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0317%10 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0613%10 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0216%9 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0811%9 Apr
mirage8–2-0.0127%9 Apr
mirage13–4-0.013%9 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0122%9 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0515%7 Apr
dust213–70.079%7 Apr
inferno13–60.0012%7 Apr
dust216–130.0724%7 Apr
ancient11–130.0218%7 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0330%7 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0217%7 Apr
anubis13–60.0214%7 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0411%7 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0428%7 Apr
mirage8–130.039%6 Apr
dust216–14-0.0420%6 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0613%6 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0616%3 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0222%3 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0312%2 Apr
dust213–16-0.018%1 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0119%1 Apr
overpass13–9-0.059%1 Apr
mirage12–16-0.039%1 Apr
inferno13–10-0.035%1 Apr
dust211–13-0.0016%1 Apr
ancient8–130.0326%1 Apr
dust216–12-0.0421%1 Apr
inferno11–13-0.003%1 Apr
dust27–13-0.0312%1 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0620%31 Mar
overpass13–100.0520%31 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0514%31 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0813%31 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0117%31 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0616%31 Mar
mirage13–70.0414%30 Mar
dust213–9-0.0117%30 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0513%29 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0424%29 Mar
dust22–13-0.089%29 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0918%28 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0625%28 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0413%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.043%27 Mar
mirage15–15-0.086%27 Mar
dust213–110.0526%26 Mar
dust29–13-0.0220%23 Mar
dust213–100.0023%21 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0519%21 Mar
dust213–30.0531%21 Mar
mirage11–130.0231%20 Mar
dust213–8-0.0114%27 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0917%27 Feb
dust216–140.0415%26 Feb
dust213–60.0722%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →