MarVinO — CS2 Stats
PL76561198034436454[U:1:74170726]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Pink band median | vs Pink band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 57.6% | 48.1% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 11.0% | 12.9% | 1.9% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.97 | 1.08 | 0.11 short |
| Match win rate | 41.5% | 46.5% | 5.0% short |
This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Excellent counter-strafing
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 23 | 7–16 | 30% | -0.05 | |
| B | 20 | 10–10 | 50% | -0.04 | |
| C | 18 | 7–11 | 39% | -0.04 | |
| B | 17 | 8–9 | 47% | -0.05 | |
| C | 17 | 6–11 | 35% | -0.05 | |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.05 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.838% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 17.606% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
30% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 32% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.04 | 28% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.04 | 9% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.10 | 6% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.07 | 18% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 11% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.07 | 11% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 15% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.07 | 28% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.11 | 6% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 25% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.03 | 9% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.14 | 9% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.09 | 12% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.07 | 4% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 13% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.01 | 7% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 8% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 12% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.07 | 12% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 9% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.05 | 8% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.11 | 11% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.04 | 3% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 14% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 7% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.05 | 10% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.11 | 6% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.08 | 10% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 4% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 11% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.06 | 15% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 9% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 14 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.06 | 11% | 14 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 25% | 14 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.00 | 18% | 14 Feb → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 14 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.08 | 6% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 17% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.01 | 35% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.06 | 9% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 8% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.08 | 12% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 6% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 8% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.09 | 4% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 17% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.06 | 8% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.13 | 0% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.09 | 13% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.07 | 10% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.09 | 7% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.00 | 6% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.08 | 11% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.00 | 11% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 13% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.08 | 9% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.04 | 13% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.10 | 5% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 15% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 15% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 5% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 4% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 7% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.09 | 6% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.10 | 14% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.10 | 8% | 2 Feb → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 16% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 15% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.07 | 11% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.03 | 24% | 29 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 29 Jan → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.07 | 19% | 29 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.05 | 17% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.07 | 10% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 7% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 4% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 2% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.07 | 5% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.08 | 6% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.11 | 4% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 8% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 12% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.08 | 11% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 5% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 2% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.09 | 8% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.05 | 13% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.02 | 12% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 15% | 23 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.