Fl4mingo

Fl4mingo — CS2 Stats

76561198025601344[U:1:65335616]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,995Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,256Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,924Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4639 of 17207 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFl4mingoFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,924 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning47
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56377Last 10056%Win rateWLWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression4.7
Utility5.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–2
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
147In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2314961%0.03
cacheB22111150%0.01
mirageA1810856%0.01
ancientB137654%-0.01
infernoS108280%0.04
nukeB84450%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

94,951Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
4,588Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
10,114MVPs
2,444Hours (in match)
5,162Bombs planted
1,130Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,873
AWP5,043
FAMAS2,381
P2502,116
SSG 081,903

Lifetime map wins

8,228nuke
7,981inferno
5,921dust2
1,217vertigo
706train
123aztec
121italy
112dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
54%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2540%1.1116.6
Anubis1362%1.3313.6
Nuke1267%1.6820.8
Vertigo1250%1.3117.2
Inferno1164%1.3616.3
Ancient933%0.9914.0
Overpass633%1.1717.7
Dust22100%1.7919.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
526msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7688% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–6-0.039%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0418%28 Aug
dust213–40.0222%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0512%27 Aug
mirage6–130.0416%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0017%26 Aug
inferno8–130.0112%25 Aug
cache13–10-0.0714%25 Aug
cache9–130.0119%24 Aug
ancient13–70.0615%24 Aug
dust213–80.0227%23 Aug
cache6–130.0324%23 Aug
dust26–130.0421%23 Aug
inferno16–140.0624%22 Aug
cache13–80.0720%21 Aug
cache13–20.1324%19 Aug
cache13–30.0911%19 Aug
anubis7–2-0.0113%19 Aug
cache0–4-0.080%19 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0211%19 Aug
mirage6–130.0517%19 Aug
mirage8–130.0421%19 Aug
dust213–10-0.0126%18 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0514%17 Aug
dust211–130.0124%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0526%16 Aug
cache8–130.0218%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0622%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0321%16 Aug
cache13–80.0623%15 Aug
cache11–13-0.0225%14 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0613%13 Aug
dust213–40.0715%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0313%11 Aug
ancient11–130.0014%10 Aug
cache7–130.0211%10 Aug
dust213–110.0419%10 Aug
inferno13–00.1020%9 Aug
dust213–11-0.0415%9 Aug
inferno13–90.0717%8 Aug
dust213–40.0622%8 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0117%8 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0815%8 Aug
dust213–110.1117%8 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0221%8 Aug
inferno6–130.0113%8 Aug
dust211–130.0021%8 Aug
dust212–120.0828%7 Aug
nuke5–130.0023%6 Aug
dust212–120.0218%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0218%5 Aug
cache13–40.0325%3 Aug
mirage0–3-0.030%3 Aug
inferno13–110.0433%3 Aug
nuke13–90.0120%3 Aug
inferno13–60.0516%3 Aug
vertigo0–13-0.0413%3 Aug
dust213–40.0917%3 Aug
ancient13–70.0226%1 Aug
cache13–70.0023%1 Aug
nuke16–140.0317%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.0322%29 Jul
dust215–150.0122%29 Jul
cache7–13-0.0019%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0217%29 Jul
cache13–110.0225%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0516%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0621%22 Jul
cache13–20.0421%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0026%22 Jul
dust23–13-0.0714%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0215%21 Jul
mirage13–70.0015%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.0522%20 Jul
dust213–60.0422%20 Jul
ancient15–150.0119%19 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0024%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0027%16 Jul
mirage13–70.1020%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0711%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0314%15 Jul
dust213–8-0.0220%15 Jul
ancient13–60.0438%15 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0026%14 Jul
dust213–30.1225%13 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0619%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0118%11 Jul
cache13–50.0431%10 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0611%10 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0119%9 Jul
cache6–13-0.0223%8 Jul
cache5–130.0524%7 Jul
mirage13–90.0623%3 Jul
dust213–5-0.0321%3 Jul
dust212–120.0711%2 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0313%2 Jul
dust213–110.0320%2 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0218%1 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0212%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0521%1 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →