Mackelito

Mackelito — CS2 Stats

76561198024751218[U:1:64485490]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,004Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,174Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4430 of 23695 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,832 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMackelitoFACEITLevel 10 · 1,832 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,174 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning52
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5743Last 10057%Win rateWWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression6.6
Utility4.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch1.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time506ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–5
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB28131546%0.00
dust2A26151158%-0.00
nukeA149564%0.02
cacheS107370%0.03
anubisC104640%-0.01
mirage440100%-0.00
ancient31233%-0.05
vertigo32167%-0.02
overpass110100%0.08
train110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

497Matches
54%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
81.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2365%1.0016.2
Dust22268%1.1716.1
Mirage1963%1.0815.8
Ancient1631%0.9615.4
Anubis1443%0.9714.9
Nuke944%0.7514.0
Cache6100%1.6417.8
Overpass333%0.8614.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
515msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
3.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1499 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2082% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0816%28 Aug
inferno13–40.0325%28 Aug
dust213–70.0638%28 Aug
dust211–130.0721%28 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0418%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0926%28 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0420%28 Aug
inferno19–16-0.0219%27 Aug
inferno0–13-0.130%27 Aug
mirage13–40.0220%27 Aug
cache13–90.0018%26 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0115%26 Aug
overpass13–70.0811%26 Aug
dust213–9-0.0324%26 Aug
cache12–160.0422%26 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0657%26 Aug
anubis13–70.0213%25 Aug
cache13–70.0927%25 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0933%25 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0220%24 Aug
dust213–30.1219%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0320%17 Aug
inferno16–130.0118%17 Aug
dust213–3-0.0440%17 Aug
dust23–130.0419%17 Aug
inferno9–130.0528%16 Aug
nuke13–40.0428%16 Aug
inferno13–90.0225%16 Aug
dust213–8-0.0717%16 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0314%16 Aug
vertigo13–80.0129%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0029%16 Aug
nuke10–130.0624%16 Aug
anubis13–90.0239%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0235%15 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0123%14 Aug
nuke13–100.1027%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.0015%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0113%14 Aug
inferno10–130.0121%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0323%14 Aug
anubis13–70.0220%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0025%14 Aug
dust213–80.0728%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0712%11 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0722%11 Aug
dust213–110.0222%9 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0516%9 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0323%8 Aug
cache13–70.0618%8 Aug
nuke13–10.1029%8 Aug
dust213–80.0038%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.029%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0717%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0530%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0419%5 Aug
dust213–70.0016%4 Aug
dust27–130.0525%4 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0218%4 Aug
inferno8–130.0613%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0811%3 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0029%3 Aug
cache13–30.0627%3 Aug
anubis9–130.0217%3 Aug
inferno7–130.0627%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0837%3 Aug
inferno11–130.0219%2 Aug
anubis7–130.0117%2 Aug
cache13–10.0418%1 Aug
dust213–7-0.0018%1 Aug
cache6–130.0425%1 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0315%1 Aug
train13–90.0619%31 Jul
inferno13–60.037%31 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.0430%31 Jul
dust23–10-0.1214%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0216%31 Jul
nuke13–50.1316%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0428%31 Jul
dust210–130.019%31 Jul
dust213–6-0.0335%31 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0313%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.038%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0523%31 Jul
cache13–10-0.0127%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0428%31 Jul
dust21–9-0.0433%31 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0218%29 Jul
inferno13–70.0818%29 Jul
inferno15–19-0.0120%29 Jul
dust213–80.0513%28 Jul
cache14–16-0.0519%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0125%28 Jul
ancient17–19-0.0315%28 Jul
cache13–50.0315%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0122%28 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0116%27 Jul
nuke13–70.1213%27 Jul
dust213–30.0541%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0725%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →