Jay Lunar — CS2 Stats

US76561198023391842[U:1:63126114]Steam profile ↗

1,607Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,711Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10169 of 27205 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning50

Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1

Aggression5.4

Utility7.2

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning5.0

Utility7.2

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time590ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms

Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — debris 9–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

debrisBest map · 100% over 6cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.01
mirage	B	17	8–9	47%	0.02
inferno	A	17	10–7	59%	0.03
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	0.04
nuke	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
debris	S	6	6–0	100%	0.09
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.09
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.14
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches

67%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

86.9ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Overpass	1	100%	0.88	15.0
Dust2	1	0%	1.00	20.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.46	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.8%Spray accuracy

79.4%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

597msReaction time

18.9%T opening success

56.0%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

8.7%Flash assists

9.58HE damage / grenade

15.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.9343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–10	0.18	18%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	14%	31 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	15%	31 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.12	13%	31 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.05	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.05	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.00	14%	26 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	20%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.01	29%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.06	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	17%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	20%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	24%	18 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	21%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.03	20%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	26%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	14%	17 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.06	11%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.10	17%	16 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.04	10%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–9	-0.03	18%	16 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.04	19%	16 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.10	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	14%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	10%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	20%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.11	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	8%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	6%	12 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	6%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	21%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	12%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	18%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.07	23%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	10%	12 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.06	20%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–7	0.07	19%	12 Jul →
overpass	8–8	-0.07	9%	12 Jul →
debris	9–2	0.29	10%	11 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.00	22%	11 Jul →
overpass	2–9	-0.19	18%	11 Jul →
debris	9–4	0.01	25%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	21%	11 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	18%	11 Jul →
inferno	7–0	0.06	7%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	12%	11 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	21%	11 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.04	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.03	13%	11 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	13%	11 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.09	38%	11 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.11	16%	11 Jul →
eldorado	3–9	-0.13	5%	11 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.04	21%	11 Jul →
cache	12–16	-0.05	15%	10 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	26%	10 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	30%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.06	26%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	8%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	27%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	10%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.07	14%	9 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	13%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.04	25%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	20%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	25%	9 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	13%	9 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	15%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.01	14%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	14%	7 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.02	18%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.07	21%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.07	15%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	21%	6 Jul →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	17%	6 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	18%	6 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	24%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–16	-0.04	7%	5 Jul →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	15%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.11	18%	5 Jul →
vertigo	9–2	0.11	11%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–9	0.00	28%	5 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	10%	3 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	13%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.05	11%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	13%	3 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	9%	2 Jul →