ILikeTurtles — CS2 Stats

76561198168888619[U:1:208622891]✓ No bans

995Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.5 Learning

Premier CS Rating9,432Light Blue band · top ~57.6% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35

Positioning41

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.5

Aggression5.2

Utility5.5

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5

Positioning4.1

Utility5.5

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time676ms−0ms

first ⅓ avg 677ms → last ⅓ avg 676ms

Headshot accuracy14.8%+0.7%

first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — dust2 13–10

13–1Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18cacheWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	26	13–13	50%	-0.01
inferno	A	18	11–7	61%	-0.03
mirage	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.02
ancient	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.03
cache	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.04
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.03
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.04
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches

0%Win rate

0.58Avg K/D

—ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy

30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.9%Spray accuracy

68.6%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

666msReaction time

30.1%T opening success

34.9%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

11.51HE damage / grenade

7.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.2182% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.1081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	16–13	-0.01	14%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	13%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	16%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.01	12%	25 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.05	13%	8 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	23%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.02	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	7%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	12%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	13%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.06	9%	1 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.06	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.07	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	45%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	15%	29 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	13%	27 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.07	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.03	20%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	4%	26 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.08	29%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	13%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.06	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	7%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	2%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	5%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	0%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.00	41%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	19%	18 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	3%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	4%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	16%	17 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.01	21%	17 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	10%	16 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.08	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	19%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.06	15%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	29%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	13%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.05	6%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	15%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	6%	13 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	26%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.05	6%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	18%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	13%	12 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	2%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	15%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.05	11%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.04	4%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	7 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	15%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.08	17%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	6%	6 Jul →
overpass	5–13	-0.07	10%	6 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	14%	3 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	6%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	14%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	29%	3 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.04	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	16%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	9%	1 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	12%	1 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	14%	25 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.07	11%	25 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	12%	24 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	9%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–7	-0.07	22%	24 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	14%	23 Jun →
overpass	14–16	0.03	8%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	16%	23 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	11%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.02	19%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.05	6%	22 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	6%	20 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.03	14%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	16%	19 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	11%	19 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.01	13%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.02	29%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.00	7%	18 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	20%	18 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	16%	18 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	23%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.03	0%	15 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	10%	15 Jun →
inferno	2–9	-0.10	13%	15 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.01	18%	14 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	18%	14 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.02	19%	14 Jun →