deacon ツ — CS2 Stats

TW76561198022012171[U:1:61746443]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,608Tracked matches83%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,269Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,003), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	62.4%	47.0%	48.4%	above
Shot accuracy	16.9%	12.8%	13.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.64	1.07	1.08	0.43 short
Match win rate	52.7%	46.4%	47.0%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning51

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY76–19–5Last 10076%Win rateWWWWWLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.5

Aggression4.1

Utility7.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch7.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.1

Utility7.0

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.06

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time607ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms

Headshot accuracy32.3%−10.9%

first ⅓ avg 43.3% → last ⅓ avg 32.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.45Best rating — inferno 9–0

13–0Biggest win — anubis

13Longest win streak

W5Current streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 60% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	38	29–9	76%	0.03
nuke	S	14	10–4	71%	0.04
mirage	S	10	7–3	70%	0.02
cache	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
anubis	S	7	6–1	86%	0.03
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
train	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.02
office	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00
dust2	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01
poseidon	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (60% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

175,482Lifetime kills

0.64K/D

9,712Matches

52.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players

62.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players

16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players

23,231MVPs

3,657Hours (in match)

9,442Bombs planted

2,482Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4770,417

M4A4 / M4A1-S40,094

P2000 / USP-S9,991

AWP8,382

Desert Eagle7,711

Glock-186,251

P2505,291

UMP-452,845

FAMAS2,263

Five-SeveN2,239

Lifetime map wins

18,474inferno

11,365dust2

3,899train

3,760nuke

2,724cbble

2,282vertigo

262office

220italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

362Matches

56%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

78.4ADR

63%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

59%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	10	60%	1.09	15.2
Mirage	10	50%	1.50	16.3
Anubis	4	100%	1.08	15.0
Dust2	4	50%	1.38	16.0
Cache	3	67%	1.23	16.3
Nuke	2	100%	1.04	12.5
Ancient	2	0%	0.82	14.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

34.1%Headshot accuracy

32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.2%Spray accuracy

85.3%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

593msReaction time

18.2%T opening success

51.9%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

11.5%Flash assists

9.64HE damage / grenade

14.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.1784% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–0	0.03	39%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	27%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.05	41%	29 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.02	50%	29 Aug →
office	13–4	0.13	50%	25 Aug →
train	9–13	-0.03	29%	25 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.03	27%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	40%	25 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	26%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.09	22%	15 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.13	33%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–6	-0.03	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.02	20%	15 Aug →
train	13–10	0.02	32%	13 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	33%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	24%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	41%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	37%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	37%	12 Aug →
train	13–0	-0.00	50%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	34%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.08	29%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.05	25%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	29%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	17%	5 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	33%	26 Jul →
train	13–3	-0.00	36%	24 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	39%	24 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.01	30%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	27%	24 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.11	28%	23 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.03	22%	23 Jul →
nuke	5–9	-0.08	40%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–5	-0.01	30%	23 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.06	25%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–1	0.16	52%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–4	-0.05	33%	23 Jul →
overpass	13–3	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	48%	10 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	37%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	41%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	30%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.04	58%	9 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	19%	9 Jul →
train	13–9	0.04	33%	9 Jul →
italy	13–8	-0.04	33%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.11	33%	9 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.04	50%	9 Jul →
shelter	13–5	0.12	53%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.02	27%	9 Jul →
office	13–4	0.00	39%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	35%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.10	39%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.08	49%	9 Jul →
inferno	9–3	-0.06	38%	5 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.02	48%	5 Jul →
inferno	9–6	-0.01	16%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.04	38%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.06	61%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	28%	4 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.00	47%	4 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	43%	4 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	41%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.00	31%	30 Jun →
cache	2–13	0.00	59%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.15	40%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.13	50%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–2	0.04	52%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.04	35%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.01	36%	26 Jun →
inferno	9–7	-0.06	30%	25 Jun →
nuke	9–1	0.10	46%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–4	-0.04	53%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.09	60%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.01	43%	25 Jun →
nuke	9–2	0.12	37%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.06	41%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–0	0.09	88%	25 Jun →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	23%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–7	-0.07	28%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.09	65%	25 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.02	35%	25 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	50%	25 Jun →
nuke	9–0	0.36	37%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–6	-0.04	40%	24 Jun →
poseidon	9–4	0.09	40%	24 Jun →
poseidon	9–5	-0.02	48%	24 Jun →
nuke	6–9	-0.08	21%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.21	21%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.14	33%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.12	71%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–5	-0.02	42%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.01	35%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.03	31%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–7	-0.04	48%	22 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.15	53%	22 Jun →
inferno	9–0	0.45	57%	22 Jun →
nuke	9–7	0.06	45%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	49%	22 Jun →
inferno	12–12	0.03	33%	22 Jun →