Nori — CS2 Stats

MY76561198020359135[U:1:60093407]Steam profile ↗

220Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,430Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	53.4%	42.7%	44.0%	above
Shot accuracy	15.0%	10.8%	11.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.54	1.00	1.03	above
Match win rate	199.7%	44.1%	45.1%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning41

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–35–4Last 10061%Win rateWLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression5.8

Utility3.8

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning4.1

Utility3.8

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time598ms−0ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms

Headshot accuracy23.5%−11.9%

first ⅓ avg 35.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — cache 13–2

13–0Biggest win — mirage

10Longest win streak

6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	31	17–14	55%	0.02
cache	A	20	12–8	60%	0.08
mirage	S	12	8–4	67%	0.03
nuke	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.03
anubis	S	7	6–1	86%	-0.01
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
office	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
fachwerk	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,436Lifetime kills

1.54K/D · Top 5% of Level 4 players

637Matches

199.7%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 4 players

53.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players

15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players

2,162MVPs

257Hours (in match)

1,278Bombs planted

161Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,288

AWP3,016

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,249

SSG 081,993

FAMAS1,396

P2501,205

Galil AR957

Desert Eagle940

P2000 / USP-S898

AUG846

Lifetime map wins

6,611dust2

1,974inferno

1,690nuke

1,010train

428dust

362vertigo

332cbble

276aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches

52%Win rate

1.61Avg K/D

92.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	13	46%	1.28	20.5
Mirage	9	56%	1.20	16.2
Cache	3	67%	1.50	16.3
Inferno	2	0%	1.11	17.5
Nuke	2	100%	3.75	15.0
Ancient	2	50%	0.94	12.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.00	22.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

86.0%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

606msReaction time

28.0%T opening success

52.5%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

10.93HE damage / grenade

1.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 1.964 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.0339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	-0.02	33%	30 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	26%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.13	21%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.07	14%	23 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	13%	23 Aug →
cache	7–3	0.10	21%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.18	16%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	27%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	23%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	19%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	29%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	21%	15 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.03	18%	15 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.15	17%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	27%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.05	17%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.03	27%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	41%	11 Aug →
nuke	5–3	-0.02	67%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.07	27%	10 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	37%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.16	24%	26 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.08	18%	26 Jul →
office	6–13	-0.07	10%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.05	19%	25 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.06	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.05	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	15%	25 Jul →
ancient	5–9	0.05	25%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	14%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	21%	25 Jul →
fachwerk	13–3	-0.03	24%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.05	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	19%	25 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.33	27%	24 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	38%	24 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	21%	24 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.07	23%	24 Jul →
mirage	9–3	0.05	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.13	39%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.09	34%	23 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	29%	23 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.07	24%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	29%	23 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.02	10%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.13	25%	23 Jul →
anubis	11–9	-0.04	34%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.09	35%	19 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	36%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	38%	19 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.01	20%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	24%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	28%	19 Jul →
office	13–3	0.09	29%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.01	31%	16 Jul →
boulder	13–10	-0.05	25%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.12	29%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.06	34%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	35%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.07	33%	15 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.12	27%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	22%	14 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	39%	14 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.05	21%	14 Jul →
fachwerk	13–6	-0.02	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	22%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	31%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	19%	12 Jul →
office	7–2	0.04	63%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.08	43%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	35%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	41%	12 Jul →
fachwerk	13–10	0.01	33%	12 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	29%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	39%	12 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	38%	29 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	23%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	32%	29 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.12	34%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.05	20%	29 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.09	30%	29 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.00	35%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.03	36%	27 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.07	50%	27 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	50%	27 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.05	46%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.15	20%	24 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	40%	24 Jun →
dust2	3–13	0.03	21%	24 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	53%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.04	39%	24 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.00	32%	24 Jun →
cache	13–2	0.01	73%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.05	28%	21 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.10	29%	21 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.07	38%	21 Jun →