Ducky — CS2 Stats

CA76561198014774833[U:1:54509105]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

779Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since

955Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating8,868Light Blue band · top ~60.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#26481 of 35861 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	39.0%	42.5%	44.2%	5.2% short
Shot accuracy	12.8%	10.9%	11.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.13	0.99	1.04	above
Match win rate	44.8%	44.2%	45.3%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning62

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8

Aggression9.1

Utility5.4

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels5.3

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning6.2

Utility5.4

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels5.3

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time653ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms

Headshot accuracy17.9%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–9

13–2Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L4Current streak

4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	22	10–12	45%	0.02
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	0.02
mirage	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
nuke	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.01
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.04
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.03
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,253Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players

2,338Matches

44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

39.0%Headshot %

12.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players

6,107MVPs

955Hours (in match)

1,831Bombs planted

647Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,205

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,400

AWP7,364

P2000 / USP-S3,139

Glock-182,476

P902,108

SG 5532,079

Desert Eagle1,774

AUG1,664

SSG 081,270

Lifetime map wins

6,794dust2

2,777inferno

2,624nuke

1,218office

555train

274vertigo

250cbble

102lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy

40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.1%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

631msReaction time

38.4%T opening success

64.4%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

12.09HE damage / grenade

7.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4861 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.4332% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	8–13	0.07	18%	29 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	24%	29 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	38%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.09	24%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.02	6%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.12	27%	23 Aug →
nuke	2–13	0.00	14%	21 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	20%	21 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	9%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	6%	19 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.01	5%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.08	10%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.10	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	2–7	0.10	29%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	18%	18 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.02	46%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.00	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	23%	17 Aug →
dust2	0–6	0.02	9%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	17%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.09	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.01	9%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.07	13%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.06	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.02	18%	10 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	15%	10 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.02	15%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	20%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.00	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	26%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.00	33%	7 Aug →
fachwerk	9–13	0.02	11%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	8%	7 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.07	14%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.09	18%	6 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.05	17%	6 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	21%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	19%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	12%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.08	21%	5 Aug →
mirage	8–1	0.10	38%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	18%	5 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	10%	5 Aug →
nuke	2–4	-0.02	27%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	23%	4 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.01	24%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	17%	2 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.03	28%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.07	18%	1 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.02	21%	29 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	14%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	25%	26 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.11	33%	25 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	12%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	14%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	10%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	16%	23 Jul →
nuke	16–12	-0.00	15%	23 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.05	16%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	14%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.13	17%	22 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	17%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.04	6%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.09	10%	22 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	12%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	6%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	23%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	17%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	18%	21 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	20%	19 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	14%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.10	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.09	7%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	22%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	11%	15 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.05	13%	15 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	6%	14 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	19%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	17%	14 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	21%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.13	29%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	18%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	23%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	13%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.11	26%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	23%	1 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	8%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.07	35%	25 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.10	27%	25 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.09	12%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.10	9%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.12	19%	21 Jun →