Salv~ — CS2 Stats

76561198014166340[U:1:53900612]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,599Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating28,196Top 5% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#763 of 53567 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning73

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY66–34Last 10066%Win rateWLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression10.0

Utility5.4

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels5.3

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning7.3

Utility5.4

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels5.3

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time543ms−72ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy29.1%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 30.4% → last ⅓ avg 29.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–0

13–0Biggest win — dust2

10Longest win streak

8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 30anubisWeakest map · 50% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	36	20–16	56%	0.03
mirage	S	30	24–6	80%	0.06
ancient	S	15	10–5	67%	0.02
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.04
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
train	—	3	3–0	100%	0.08
nuke	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches

64%Win rate

1.41Avg K/D

—ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	44	66%	1.51	21.0
Anubis	30	70%	1.47	18.0
Dust2	23	43%	1.15	18.1
Ancient	21	62%	1.44	20.7
Vertigo	19	58%	1.58	20.1
Nuke	13	100%	1.36	19.7
Inferno	8	62%	1.38	19.3
Overpass	4	50%	0.82	12.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.2%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

6.7°Preaim

572msReaction time

48.1%T opening success

54.4%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

11.0%Flash assists

8.55HE damage / grenade

8.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4781 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	0.05	30%	28 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	20%	28 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	20%	28 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.04	0%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.08	26%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	0–5	-0.03	33%	27 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.09	11%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.08	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.17	35%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.04	22%	27 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.11	27%	27 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.07	100%	26 Jul →
dust2	0–2	-0.06	0%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.06	43%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	34%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	35%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	35%	25 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.08	30%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	33%	25 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.16	27%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.09	33%	24 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.04	29%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.16	54%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	29%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	32%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	0%	14 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.03	47%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	42%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	36%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.10	31%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.10	32%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.10	45%	14 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	28%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.10	48%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	20%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	24%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.01	38%	2 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.14	25%	6 Feb →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	50%	6 Feb →
anubis	7–0	0.12	13%	6 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	29%	5 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.06	26%	5 Feb →
overpass	13–1	0.07	28%	4 Feb →
ancient	13–1	0.06	26%	4 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.17	15%	3 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.08	31%	3 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	22%	3 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.06	44%	3 Feb →
anubis	13–6	0.01	36%	3 Feb →
dust2	7–13	0.00	19%	3 Feb →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	46%	3 Feb →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	47%	2 Feb →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	28%	2 Feb →
overpass	13–6	0.07	20%	2 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.06	25%	1 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.01	34%	1 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.09	32%	1 Feb →
anubis	13–4	0.06	39%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–10	0.08	37%	26 Jan →
dust2	13–6	0.05	33%	26 Jan →
mirage	13–6	0.01	33%	26 Jan →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	11%	26 Jan →
dust2	13–2	0.05	15%	25 Jan →
dust2	13–0	0.22	33%	25 Jan →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	15%	25 Jan →
dust2	13–6	0.02	25%	25 Jan →
overpass	5–13	-0.03	33%	25 Jan →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	25%	25 Jan →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	35%	25 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.04	32%	25 Jan →
nuke	13–9	0.02	20%	15 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.04	12%	15 Jan →
mirage	13–6	0.07	26%	15 Jan →
train	13–7	0.06	15%	15 Jan →
dust2	13–5	0.02	34%	11 Jan →
mirage	13–2	0.09	29%	11 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.08	29%	4 Jan →
dust2	12–16	0.00	38%	4 Jan →
ancient	4–13	0.02	27%	4 Jan →
mirage	13–2	0.09	35%	4 Jan →
train	13–9	0.02	47%	3 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.06	27%	3 Jan →
dust2	13–5	0.02	38%	3 Jan →
nuke	13–8	0.00	26%	25 Dec →
ancient	13–3	0.05	24%	25 Dec →
ancient	4–13	0.02	31%	25 Dec →
mirage	13–8	0.10	24%	25 Dec →
dust2	13–1	0.08	41%	24 Dec →
overpass	8–13	0.01	38%	24 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.11	35%	24 Dec →
dust2	13–9	0.06	48%	24 Dec →
ancient	3–13	-0.05	30%	24 Dec →
mirage	13–3	0.13	27%	24 Dec →
dust2	4–13	0.02	48%	24 Dec →
train	13–7	0.15	40%	16 Dec →