PINKy — CS2 Stats

76561198011588125[U:1:51322397]

1,321Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,036Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating19,570Purple band · top ~10.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17589 of 41555 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,570Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,570
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 430 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	57.5%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	15.6%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.19	1.08
Match win rate	45.4%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning60

Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWLTWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.7

Aggression1.8

Utility7.3

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 8% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning6.0

Utility7.3

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time584ms+13ms

first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy22.2%+0.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — mirage 13–7

13–1Biggest win — mirage

10Longest win streak

7–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 79% over 19anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	30	18–12	60%	0.01
mirage	S	19	15–4	79%	0.02
vertigo	A	19	12–7	63%	-0.00
nuke	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.01
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

190,934Lifetime kills

1.19K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

6,705Matches

45.4%Match win rate

57.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

18,651MVPs

4,036Hours (in match)

6,498Bombs planted

2,467Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4775,285

M4A4 / M4A1-S30,378

P2000 / USP-S20,154

AWP15,764

Desert Eagle7,507

Glock-185,654

P2503,747

Five-SeveN2,668

FAMAS2,568

SCAR-202,484

Lifetime map wins

7,555nuke

7,184inferno

5,522dust2

2,646vertigo

2,589train

1,800cbble

240safehouse

170lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,500Matches

52%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

—ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	167	53%	1.09	16.6
Ancient	160	53%	1.13	17.4
Vertigo	121	51%	1.09	15.9
Nuke	88	52%	1.04	16.1
Anubis	74	49%	1.17	16.8
Inferno	30	53%	1.19	17.2
Overpass	23	43%	1.09	15.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy

31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.6%Spray accuracy

78.6%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

578msReaction time

8.2%T opening success

48.7%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

8.41HE damage / grenade

11.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 8.1601% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–3	0.09	29%	8 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	20%	8 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	22%	8 Sept →
mirage	16–13	0.07	24%	2 May →
ancient	13–7	0.11	30%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.30	25%	24 Mar →
mirage	17–19	-0.02	22%	10 Mar →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	23%	10 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	16%	10 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.11	26%	10 Mar →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	13%	9 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.03	15%	9 Mar →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	31%	9 Mar →
mirage	13–1	0.01	11%	9 Mar →
nuke	13–10	0.01	19%	9 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	23%	9 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	17%	9 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.09	24%	9 Mar →
vertigo	8–13	-0.00	19%	9 Mar →
vertigo	13–4	0.02	18%	8 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	19%	8 Mar →
inferno	1–7	-0.07	67%	7 Mar →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	20%	7 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.05	15%	6 Mar →
nuke	11–13	-0.10	16%	6 Mar →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	27%	6 Mar →
ancient	11–12	0.03	25%	6 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	16%	6 Mar →
vertigo	9–13	0.00	14%	5 Mar →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	22%	5 Mar →
ancient	4–12	-0.03	15%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.02	22%	4 Mar →
vertigo	13–4	0.06	28%	4 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	16%	4 Mar →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	18%	3 Mar →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	13%	3 Mar →
vertigo	6–13	-0.07	10%	3 Mar →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	21%	3 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	10%	3 Mar →
vertigo	13–10	0.05	31%	3 Mar →
nuke	13–8	0.02	13%	3 Mar →
mirage	16–13	0.03	26%	3 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.12	23%	2 Mar →
vertigo	13–5	0.04	25%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.08	27%	2 Mar →
anubis	13–8	0.01	37%	2 Mar →
vertigo	19–17	-0.06	19%	2 Mar →
anubis	14–16	-0.07	16%	2 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	23%	2 Mar →
anubis	11–13	0.03	22%	2 Mar →
nuke	13–2	0.07	31%	2 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	17%	2 Mar →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	22%	1 Mar →
ancient	14–16	0.00	15%	1 Mar →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	14%	1 Mar →
ancient	16–13	0.03	16%	1 Mar →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	21%	1 Mar →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	16%	28 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.04	19%	28 Feb →
inferno	14–16	-0.05	27%	28 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.09	18%	28 Feb →
vertigo	13–4	0.03	32%	27 Feb →
overpass	14–16	-0.02	27%	27 Feb →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	26%	27 Feb →
nuke	16–12	-0.01	21%	26 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.04	31%	26 Feb →
vertigo	13–3	0.05	37%	26 Feb →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	24%	25 Feb →
anubis	14–16	0.00	26%	25 Feb →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	31%	25 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.04	19%	25 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	12%	25 Feb →
nuke	13–9	0.01	23%	25 Feb →
nuke	13–8	0.03	15%	25 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.19	25%	25 Feb →
vertigo	13–10	0.01	35%	24 Feb →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	17%	24 Feb →
mirage	16–14	-0.05	22%	24 Feb →
inferno	7–13	0.00	20%	24 Feb →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	27%	24 Feb →
vertigo	13–2	0.01	13%	24 Feb →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	15%	24 Feb →
nuke	7–13	0.01	27%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	19%	23 Feb →
vertigo	13–9	-0.04	10%	23 Feb →
overpass	9–13	-0.04	18%	23 Feb →
ancient	4–13	0.01	20%	23 Feb →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	23%	19 Feb →
vertigo	16–13	0.03	24%	19 Feb →
vertigo	8–13	-0.06	19%	19 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	26%	18 Feb →
ancient	16–13	0.08	21%	18 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.03	18%	18 Feb →
vertigo	7–13	-0.06	27%	18 Feb →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	26%	18 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.06	27%	18 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	18%	18 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	17%	18 Feb →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	20%	18 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.05	30%	17 Feb →