sieppari

sieppari — CS2 Stats

FI76561198008375366[U:1:48109638]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,167Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,230Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,216 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,587), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate35.2%43.7%44.7%9.5% short
Shot accuracy10.8%11.8%12.1%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.021.040.10 short
Match win rate34.6%45.0%45.2%10.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsieppariFACEITLevel 5 · 1,216 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning51
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50473Last 10050%Win rateLWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.7
Aggression3.2
Utility6.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning5.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time663ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112957%-0.02
ancientB2091145%-0.02
dust2B126650%-0.01
mirageA106460%-0.02
overpassA95456%-0.04
trainC94544%-0.02
infernoS87188%-0.00
anubisD8080%-0.01
cache21150%-0.03
office1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,416Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,587Matches
34.6%Match win rate
35.2%Headshot %
10.8%Shot accuracy
4,073MVPs
1,230Hours (in match)
3,590Bombs planted
771Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,940
AWP2,494
MP71,446
FAMAS1,425
MP91,407

Lifetime map wins

4,599nuke
4,078inferno
2,374dust2
1,852train
939vertigo
86ar_shoots
78cbble
70safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

736Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
67.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8042%0.7911.8
Nuke6656%1.0713.3
Ancient5751%0.9213.7
Anubis4540%0.8712.5
Dust24445%1.0912.2
Inferno2060%1.0014.7
Overpass1681%0.8011.9
Train1547%1.0015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
649msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.3%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
10.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0585% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3893% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.074%5 May
cache13–90.028%5 May
inferno13–60.0314%5 May
mirage13–4-0.037%26 Apr
dust213–00.0911%23 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0710%18 Apr
overpass8–13-0.054%18 Apr
anubis8–13-0.016%26 Mar
ancient13–100.0112%26 Mar
inferno13–70.0413%25 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0028%25 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0413%25 Mar
nuke12–16-0.0312%24 Mar
nuke13–90.0018%20 Mar
ancient13–90.0620%8 Mar
dust215–19-0.0613%6 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0311%6 Mar
dust219–160.0518%3 Mar
ancient13–10-0.025%13 Feb
anubis8–13-0.064%6 Feb
nuke13–80.0424%6 Feb
nuke8–13-0.087%6 Feb
dust213–3-0.087%2 Feb
dust213–10.0310%2 Feb
anubis1–13-0.0512%30 Jan
nuke13–100.0113%15 Jan
train4–13-0.0215%5 Jan
train6–130.0113%5 Jan
train15–19-0.0314%3 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0312%2 Jan
train10–13-0.036%2 Jan
mirage16–13-0.0413%13 Dec
overpass13–110.0311%12 Dec
train7–13-0.0514%11 Dec
dust24–13-0.1019%11 Dec
nuke5–13-0.056%11 Dec
dust213–40.0614%11 Dec
nuke13–6-0.030%9 Dec
ancient13–11-0.064%9 Dec
train13–2-0.057%5 Dec
nuke16–120.0113%5 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0210%4 Dec
ancient7–13-0.076%4 Dec
dust213–40.036%4 Dec
ancient13–20.0211%4 Dec
inferno13–3-0.028%3 Dec
inferno13–100.0113%28 Nov
nuke13–7-0.0111%28 Nov
nuke13–11-0.0311%28 Nov
nuke8–13-0.0613%28 Nov
overpass13–8-0.0514%14 Nov
mirage13–00.0117%11 Nov
ancient8–130.0219%11 Nov
nuke13–80.006%8 Nov
dust210–13-0.0519%8 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0119%7 Nov
nuke13–40.009%31 Oct
nuke13–30.0414%27 Oct
inferno13–10-0.0410%27 Oct
overpass13–6-0.0519%26 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0322%26 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0612%26 Oct
overpass1–13-0.117%17 Oct
ancient16–13-0.0013%17 Oct
mirage13–110.0215%6 Oct
ancient13–50.016%6 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0111%6 Oct
mirage13–90.0021%4 Oct
nuke11–13-0.0619%4 Oct
nuke9–130.007%3 Oct
nuke13–3-0.0120%3 Oct
office9–13-0.0418%3 Oct
overpass1–13-0.0011%24 Sept
dust211–13-0.0510%12 Sept
dust210–13-0.059%12 Sept
overpass11–13-0.0013%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.019%12 Aug
train13–30.0116%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.066%12 Aug
ancient5–13-0.054%10 Jul
train13–60.0320%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0418%10 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0814%8 Jul
mirage13–3-0.027%8 Jul
anubis9–130.0014%4 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0124%4 Jul
anubis12–12-0.045%2 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0612%25 Jun
nuke13–6-0.036%25 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0314%19 Jun
ancient11–130.017%19 Jun
train13–8-0.046%19 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0123%25 May
anubis9–130.0210%25 May
ancient6–13-0.029%23 May
nuke8–13-0.0015%23 May
ancient13–6-0.0121%23 May
inferno15–150.0318%23 May
anubis15–150.0813%9 May
mirage8–130.0114%6 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →