1obro — CS2 Stats

76561198006121843[U:1:45856115]

776Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,632Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19592 of 38054 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG1obroPREMIER17,632 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.3
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time633ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 706ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — ancient 13–5
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2316770%-0.01
mirageA2112957%0.01
nukeC1871139%0.01
ancientS139469%0.00
anubisD113827%-0.03
overpassS75271%0.02
dust2S64267%0.00
cache1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno30%0.6411.3
Nuke250%1.2822.0
Anubis10%0.6712.0
Vertigo10%0.385.0
Mirage10%1.5024.0
Overpass1100%0.8315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
628msReaction time
17.6%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
11.47HE damage / grenade
8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.6205% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.1011%3 Jul
nuke13–40.069%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0217%3 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0416%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0417%5 Jun
overpass16–130.0115%5 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0731%5 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0214%29 May
anubis13–9-0.0416%29 May
inferno13–110.0222%29 May
mirage9–13-0.0612%29 May
ancient13–2-0.0117%22 May
mirage13–8-0.0321%22 May
anubis11–13-0.0321%22 May
inferno9–50.0313%22 May
inferno9–60.0619%22 May
inferno13–4-0.0730%13 May
inferno13–30.0312%13 May
anubis10–130.0016%13 May
nuke10–13-0.0813%13 May
ancient13–11-0.0515%13 May
cache5–130.0222%9 May
mirage16–14-0.0113%9 May
mirage11–13-0.0319%9 May
overpass13–10-0.0013%8 May
anubis9–130.0116%8 May
inferno13–110.0222%8 May
nuke6–13-0.0314%30 Apr
overpass13–90.0511%30 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0312%30 Apr
anubis13–110.0025%30 Apr
dust213–9-0.0013%24 Apr
inferno15–150.0113%24 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0420%24 Apr
mirage13–6-0.016%24 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0711%17 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0220%17 Apr
ancient13–20.0517%17 Apr
mirage13–50.0414%17 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0411%17 Apr
overpass13–50.0716%17 Apr
overpass13–80.0312%17 Apr
ancient13–50.0825%17 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1116%17 Apr
dust215–15-0.0114%10 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0220%10 Apr
ancient13–100.0122%10 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0114%10 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0414%2 Apr
nuke13–80.0323%2 Apr
inferno13–90.0013%2 Apr
overpass1–9-0.0426%2 Apr
inferno8–80.0312%2 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0119%27 Mar
inferno7–13-0.059%27 Mar
mirage13–100.0416%27 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0619%23 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0118%23 Mar
dust27–13-0.0615%23 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0416%23 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0122%23 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0419%23 Mar
mirage13–70.0612%23 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0119%23 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0527%23 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0019%20 Mar
inferno13–100.0411%20 Mar
ancient13–50.0113%20 Mar
nuke6–9-0.0016%20 Mar
inferno2–9-0.2127%20 Mar
nuke3–9-0.0514%20 Mar
dust213–6-0.0223%19 Mar
mirage9–130.0614%19 Mar
overpass13–160.0115%19 Mar
dust213–50.0628%19 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0617%19 Mar
ancient13–60.0221%19 Mar
inferno13–30.0727%19 Mar
nuke13–80.0117%19 Mar
nuke2–30.0427%19 Mar
dust213–40.0616%19 Mar
mirage13–70.0116%19 Mar
nuke13–50.0426%19 Mar
mirage14–160.0418%18 Mar
mirage13–50.0520%18 Mar
inferno13–80.0426%18 Mar
mirage11–130.0619%18 Mar
ancient13–30.0619%18 Mar
mirage15–15-0.039%18 Mar
mirage9–130.0421%16 Mar
nuke13–110.0212%16 Mar
mirage11–130.0526%16 Mar
inferno13–90.0424%16 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0326%16 Mar
nuke6–130.0520%15 Mar
mirage13–30.0522%15 Mar
ancient5–130.0112%14 Mar
mirage13–30.0126%14 Mar
nuke6–90.054%14 Mar
nuke9–70.0716%14 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →