Neophyte Redglare

Neophyte Redglare — CS2 Stats

US76561198004365107[U:1:44099379]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,186Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,410Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,000Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5038 of 11100 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,205 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNeophyte RedglareFACEITLevel 6 · 1,205 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning46
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression4.8
Utility6.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time542ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+6.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–2
132Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1311In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2213959%0.01
mirageS1914574%0.03
infernoC1871139%-0.00
anubisC145936%0.01
ancientC94544%0.03
nukeS86275%0.00
cacheC83538%-0.01
overpass220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

107,293Lifetime kills
1.08K/D
5,758Matches
34.8%Match win rate
40.3%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
8,275MVPs
1,585Hours (in match)
3,036Bombs planted
1,082Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,349
UMP-456,074
AWP5,639
AUG4,747
SG 5534,203

Lifetime map wins

5,512dust2
4,775inferno
1,640nuke
894vertigo
860train
785office
624lake
379safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
87.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2157%1.4720.0
Dust21662%1.2219.8
Inferno1155%1.0117.9
Ancient978%1.0715.4
Anubis825%0.8215.4
Nuke333%1.0414.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
535msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
14.0%Flash assists
11.37HE damage / grenade
16.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6966% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0616%28 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0216%28 Aug
nuke6–00.0467%27 Aug
dust22–70.0425%27 Aug
inferno13–110.0222%26 Aug
inferno13–80.0231%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0117%24 Aug
mirage6–130.0515%24 Aug
inferno13–100.0220%23 Aug
ancient11–130.0720%23 Aug
cache11–130.0519%22 Aug
dust214–160.008%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0226%22 Aug
dust213–80.0426%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0118%21 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%19 Aug
anubis13–20.0521%19 Aug
mirage12–160.0515%19 Aug
cache13–60.0417%7 Aug
dust213–70.0420%6 Aug
dust213–9-0.0116%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0324%3 Aug
cache13–70.0217%29 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0319%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0017%28 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0417%27 Jul
mirage13–110.0020%27 Jul
dust27–130.0120%26 Jul
dust213–80.0219%22 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0326%22 Jul
nuke13–50.058%21 Jul
inferno9–130.0117%21 Jul
dust27–130.0228%21 Jul
inferno8–13-0.049%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0810%19 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0629%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.029%19 Jul
dust216–12-0.0312%18 Jul
ancient9–130.0313%18 Jul
anubis15–150.0533%18 Jul
cache2–13-0.0324%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0323%18 Jul
dust213–100.0025%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0815%16 Jul
mirage16–120.0117%15 Jul
dust215–150.0319%15 Jul
dust213–90.0117%14 Jul
anubis13–110.0421%13 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0813%13 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0216%12 Jul
cache14–160.0132%12 Jul
anubis3–130.0421%12 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0315%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0534%12 Jul
anubis16–130.0214%10 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0021%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0210%2 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0426%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0220%2 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0628%30 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0121%30 Jun
anubis8–130.0113%29 Jun
dust25–130.0025%29 Jun
dust213–40.0119%29 Jun
mirage13–80.0114%27 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0013%26 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0117%21 Jun
anubis11–130.0115%19 Jun
ancient13–30.0518%19 Jun
overpass13–80.0714%18 Jun
dust213–100.0316%17 Jun
inferno13–60.0818%15 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0212%15 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0628%14 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0413%14 Jun
ancient16–120.0610%14 Jun
dust213–100.0519%14 Jun
nuke13–80.0512%14 Jun
mirage13–100.0812%12 Jun
nuke3–13-0.090%12 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0115%12 Jun
mirage13–80.0416%11 Jun
mirage13–20.1013%10 Jun
dust213–80.0614%10 Jun
inferno14–160.0113%9 Jun
ancient13–50.1016%8 Jun
anubis11–130.016%8 Jun
dust29–13-0.0515%8 Jun
nuke16–140.0314%3 Jun
dust213–11-0.0212%31 May
dust26–130.0314%25 May
inferno15–150.0112%25 May
dust211–130.0116%24 May
nuke13–110.0215%24 May
ancient15–15-0.0212%24 May
mirage13–30.0611%24 May
mirage4–13-0.0117%24 May
inferno13–20.0416%23 May
anubis13–20.1324%23 May
inferno10–13-0.009%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →