katto myyjä silver kuk

katto myyjä silver kuk — CS2 Stats

76561197999769376[U:1:39503648]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,054Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,665Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,049Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7460 of 24607 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.7%42.5%44.2%meets
Shot accuracy14.5%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.120.991.04above
Match win rate46.3%44.2%45.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkatto myyjä silver kukFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,049 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning51
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0
Aggression6.3
Utility5.8
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.7

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time653ms−111ms
first ⅓ avg 764ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30141647%-0.01
infernoC1661038%0.01
cacheS1611569%0.04
ancientA148657%-0.01
nukeS139469%0.01
mirageS64267%-0.01
overpass41325%0.01
train1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,281Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,982Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
43.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12,181MVPs
1,438Hours (in match)
4,617Bombs planted
832Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,785
AWP8,846
FAMAS2,182
P2501,213
SSG 081,082

Lifetime map wins

10,965dust2
5,932inferno
1,980nuke
1,482train
512cbble
511vertigo
136office
66lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
642msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.86HE damage / grenade
10.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0793% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–5-0.0521%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.073%16 Aug
inferno5–130.0228%15 Aug
nuke10–8-0.0112%15 Aug
dust29–130.0310%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0323%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0113%14 Aug
nuke13–10-0.058%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0228%12 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0216%12 Aug
dust213–9-0.0122%12 Aug
cache9–130.0222%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.033%11 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0214%6 Aug
ancient13–40.0810%6 Aug
dust213–6-0.0324%6 Aug
dust213–5-0.0323%5 Aug
cache13–10.1918%5 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0632%5 Aug
nuke6–130.0617%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0611%31 Jul
cache6–2-0.0113%31 Jul
cache10–130.0119%31 Jul
mirage13–80.0224%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0315%31 Jul
inferno2–13-0.115%31 Jul
dust210–130.0014%31 Jul
mirage12–5-0.0011%29 Jul
mirage16–130.0511%29 Jul
ancient15–15-0.038%29 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0612%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0217%22 Jul
dust216–12-0.0118%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0320%17 Jul
overpass6–130.0332%17 Jul
ancient13–80.0318%17 Jul
dust22–13-0.0117%17 Jul
cache13–3-0.076%17 Jul
nuke14–160.0132%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.0122%17 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0436%17 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0317%17 Jul
cache13–50.0014%17 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0126%17 Jul
nuke16–140.0413%14 Jul
ancient13–100.0016%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0324%14 Jul
cache12–120.0420%10 Jul
ancient13–80.0517%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.0625%10 Jul
dust213–50.0730%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0521%10 Jul
cache13–70.0818%10 Jul
nuke13–50.108%10 Jul
ancient13–90.0115%1 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0712%1 Jul
inferno13–20.0724%1 Jul
dust211–130.1121%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0518%30 Jun
dust216–130.0115%30 Jun
dust215–15-0.0521%30 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0115%3 Jun
dust29–130.0022%3 Jun
cache6–13-0.0819%3 Jun
cache13–110.0420%25 May
inferno13–100.0612%25 May
cache13–30.1412%22 May
inferno13–110.0718%22 May
dust28–13-0.076%14 May
overpass12–12-0.002%13 May
inferno10–13-0.0420%13 May
mirage13–9-0.087%13 May
cache13–50.1128%13 May
dust213–5-0.1114%13 May
dust213–60.0120%7 May
cache3–130.0313%7 May
cache13–20.0513%29 Apr
cache13–60.017%29 Apr
cache13–70.0621%29 Apr
dust213–80.0118%2 Apr
inferno5–130.015%2 Apr
train0–13-0.087%2 Apr
dust21–130.0011%2 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0526%31 Mar
nuke13–60.0215%31 Mar
ancient16–12-0.0410%31 Mar
dust213–30.0717%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0118%6 Mar
overpass7–130.0317%6 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0420%6 Mar
inferno13–20.1127%6 Mar
dust213–100.0832%6 Mar
nuke9–60.1218%6 Mar
inferno9–50.1219%6 Mar
dust210–13-0.0315%21 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0321%21 Feb
ancient15–150.0119%21 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0320%21 Feb
dust213–9-0.0616%14 Feb
nuke6–9-0.0621%14 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →