P I S S — CS2 Stats

76561197998121376[U:1:37855648]✓ No bans

1,095Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,326Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#751 of 18690 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGP I S SFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER27,326 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59365Last 10059%Win rateLWLTLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression6.7
Utility5.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time597ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−5.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — train 13–2
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
50In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA26161062%-0.00
mirageA148657%0.00
nukeA127558%0.00
infernoA117464%-0.00
dust2B115645%0.01
anubisD82625%-0.02
officeA74357%0.03
train330100%0.08
ancient21150%0.02
eldorado110100%0.04
debris110100%0.08
overpass110100%0.06
warden110100%-0.03
vertigo110100%-0.04
alpine110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

223Matches
65%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
100.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1100%1.2018.0
Train1100%0.8917.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
595msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
10.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3935% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0731%21 Aug
cache13–40.0314%21 Aug
anubis5–130.0014%21 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0012%21 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0029%21 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0811%21 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0115%14 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0013%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0414%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.027%14 Aug
cache13–30.0713%14 Aug
mirage13–60.0416%9 Aug
cache13–70.0724%9 Aug
ancient13–50.0237%7 Aug
mirage1–130.0217%7 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0416%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0113%31 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0212%31 Jul
mirage13–8-0.067%31 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0414%31 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0312%30 Jul
mirage13–50.0617%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.0118%25 Jul
nuke10–130.0113%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0113%23 Jul
office13–80.0320%23 Jul
mirage6–130.029%19 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0312%19 Jul
cache13–50.0221%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0021%17 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0324%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0413%17 Jul
dust213–60.0222%17 Jul
anubis13–90.0115%17 Jul
inferno13–60.0341%17 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0116%17 Jul
dust25–130.0222%17 Jul
nuke13–0-0.020%17 Jul
dust213–4-0.0230%16 Jul
cache10–13-0.0018%16 Jul
mirage16–130.026%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0313%16 Jul
cache3–13-0.118%16 Jul
inferno13–100.0531%13 Jul
eldorado9–60.0427%13 Jul
debris9–30.0835%13 Jul
nuke13–70.0829%12 Jul
cache13–110.0120%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0219%10 Jul
cache0–13-0.0338%10 Jul
dust213–70.1027%10 Jul
cache13–80.0624%10 Jul
cache13–5-0.0510%10 Jul
nuke13–100.0317%7 Jul
dust210–13-0.0014%7 Jul
cache13–60.0138%7 Jul
overpass13–90.0625%5 Jul
nuke13–60.0610%5 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0120%5 Jul
dust28–13-0.0511%5 Jul
dust24–13-0.0326%4 Jul
dust213–30.0113%4 Jul
anubis13–60.0416%4 Jul
inferno10–130.0123%4 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0513%4 Jul
dust22–13-0.0233%4 Jul
dust213–70.0617%27 Jun
ancient9–130.0219%27 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0017%27 Jun
inferno16–130.0217%27 Jun
mirage16–140.0215%27 Jun
train13–70.0425%20 Jun
warden13–8-0.0316%20 Jun
cache5–13-0.0718%18 Jun
office13–80.0132%18 Jun
cache6–13-0.0614%7 Jun
cache13–80.0426%7 Jun
office6–130.0525%7 Jun
train13–20.1453%7 Jun
vertigo13–2-0.0412%5 Jun
anubis5–130.0026%5 Jun
office6–130.0624%5 Jun
cache7–1-0.0114%5 Jun
cache9–13-0.0217%5 Jun
train13–80.0533%30 May
office13–20.0324%30 May
nuke10–13-0.0423%30 May
cache5–13-0.0419%30 May
cache13–110.0120%29 May
office13–60.0224%29 May
cache12–12-0.0126%29 May
cache13–00.0221%29 May
inferno15–150.0219%24 May
cache13–60.0629%24 May
inferno13–50.0328%24 May
alpine13–60.0420%1 May
cache13–1-0.0125%1 May
office7–13-0.0224%1 May
cache13–110.0018%1 May
cache10–10.0414%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →