Procro-

Procro- — CS2 Stats

AU76561197998538583[U:1:38272855]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,219Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,140Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3134 of 15039 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGProcro-FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,140 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning55
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45523Last 10045%Win rateLWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression7.9
Utility6.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time606ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy30.8%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 30.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — overpass 9–13
133Biggest win — train
5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC2081240%-0.01
cacheB157847%0.02
infernoC146843%0.01
ancientB147750%0.02
mirageC135838%-0.00
nukeD124833%-0.00
dust2S54180%0.05
overpassC52340%0.02
vertigo110100%0.02
train110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

208Matches
62%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.7ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%1.0414.8
Ancient1100%1.3030.0
Dust21100%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
598msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
8.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1837% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0145%21 Aug
cache13–4-0.0036%21 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0523%21 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0424%17 Aug
anubis13–60.0333%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0022%16 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0519%16 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0136%15 Aug
ancient6–130.0432%15 Aug
cache9–130.0329%15 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0033%15 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0125%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0236%14 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0031%14 Aug
anubis5–130.0026%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0130%14 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0320%14 Aug
mirage2–130.0620%7 Aug
cache10–130.0731%7 Aug
anubis5–130.0428%7 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0157%5 Aug
nuke5–130.0840%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0228%2 Aug
cache13–11-0.0255%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0932%31 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0226%31 Jul
dust211–130.0531%31 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0142%30 Jul
cache14–16-0.0721%30 Jul
nuke16–130.0718%30 Jul
mirage13–50.0327%30 Jul
vertigo13–90.0231%30 Jul
dust216–130.0828%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0124%26 Jul
cache13–80.0329%26 Jul
anubis13–100.0030%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0421%26 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0018%19 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0319%19 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0022%19 Jul
cache13–50.0934%19 Jul
mirage9–130.0029%18 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0220%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0121%17 Jul
inferno15–150.0129%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0229%17 Jul
dust213–60.0822%17 Jul
anubis13–90.1030%17 Jul
inferno13–60.0219%17 Jul
cache11–130.0221%16 Jul
anubis10–130.0321%16 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0618%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.0123%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0120%12 Jul
cache10–130.0239%12 Jul
cache16–140.0523%11 Jul
dust216–120.0423%11 Jul
cache9–130.0232%10 Jul
ancient13–60.0325%10 Jul
cache13–80.0733%10 Jul
ancient16–130.1033%4 Jul
inferno13–70.0734%4 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0223%27 Jun
nuke9–130.0640%27 Jun
overpass1–130.0140%27 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0223%27 Jun
nuke5–13-0.1019%23 Jun
overpass13–60.0435%23 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0521%23 Jun
ancient7–20.0753%23 Jun
cache2–13-0.0367%23 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0126%13 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0521%13 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0326%13 Jun
train13–30.0437%4 Apr
anubis13–100.0118%21 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0223%20 Mar
ancient15–150.0147%20 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0120%13 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0220%13 Mar
overpass9–130.1122%8 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0433%6 Mar
ancient13–100.0625%6 Mar
anubis13–70.0624%6 Mar
mirage9–130.0033%5 Mar
inferno11–130.0432%5 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0219%4 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0217%4 Mar
anubis11–130.0233%4 Mar
dust213–90.0239%3 Mar
inferno13–100.0942%3 Mar
ancient13–60.0928%2 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0815%2 Mar
anubis5–0-0.087%2 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0524%1 Mar
nuke13–100.0726%1 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0231%26 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0215%26 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0319%26 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0236%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →