droski. — CS2 Stats

US76561197969854304[U:1:9588576]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,403Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,702Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating18,217Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13360 of 26176 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	30.1%	42.5%	44.2%	14.1% short
Shot accuracy	13.9%	10.9%	11.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.11	0.99	1.04	above
Match win rate	47.1%	44.2%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57

Positioning53

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–44Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7

Aggression6.2

Utility5.7

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7

Positioning5.3

Utility5.7

Mechanics3.1

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time509ms−131ms

first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms

Headshot accuracy14.3%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 9–6

13–3Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 15ancientWeakest map · 47% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	27	16–11	59%	0.02
nuke	B	21	10–11	48%	0.01
ancient	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.00
cache	S	15	12–3	80%	0.02
anubis	B	12	6–6	50%	0.00
mirage	A	5	3–2	60%	0.03
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

206,934Lifetime kills

1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

10,881Matches

47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

30.1%Headshot %

13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players

32,476MVPs

4,702Hours (in match)

12,785Bombs planted

4,320Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP52,919

AK-4737,196

M4A4 / M4A1-S27,664

UMP-4522,695

Tec-912,094

P2000 / USP-S9,371

P2508,988

Glock-185,319

Five-SeveN5,064

Nova3,244

Lifetime map wins

22,700inferno

12,971nuke

11,313dust2

6,326cbble

3,625train

2,999vertigo

525lake

89aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches

33%Win rate

1.44Avg K/D

76.3ADR

28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	50%	1.97	14.0
Ancient	2	0%	0.78	14.0
Dust2	1	0%	0.93	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy

35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.0%Spray accuracy

63.7%Counter-strafing

11.9°Preaim

509msReaction time

35.0%T opening success

38.7%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

14.06HE damage / grenade

5.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.7961% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.9974% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	11–13	-0.05	20%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.08	24%	27 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	20%	26 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.06	12%	25 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	9%	25 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	9%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	18%	25 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.06	8%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	21%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	14%	23 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.01	3%	23 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	27%	23 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	19%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	23%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	16%	23 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	25%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	14%	22 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.00	12%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	15%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	19%	22 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	15%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	11%	21 Aug →
inferno	16–12	-0.00	8%	21 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.05	12%	20 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	8%	20 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	9%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	19%	20 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.05	6%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	7%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	5%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	10%	19 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.03	13%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	14%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.07	18%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.06	11%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	14%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–7	-0.02	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.03	9%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.04	14%	16 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	13%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	10%	16 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.02	11%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	24%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.02	12%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	8%	13 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	17%	13 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	25%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.09	15%	12 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	18%	12 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	7%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	22%	12 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	21%	12 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	0.01	7%	12 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	13%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.00	13%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	13%	11 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	7%	11 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	12%	11 Aug →
debris	6–9	-0.01	6%	11 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.08	14%	11 Aug →
nuke	6–9	-0.09	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.15	13%	11 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.03	13%	10 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	9%	10 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.05	9%	10 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	21%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	8%	10 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	13%	9 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	25%	9 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	6%	9 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	10%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.13	29%	9 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	9%	9 Aug →
inferno	16–12	-0.00	10%	9 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	20%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.01	15%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	13%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	13%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	12%	6 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	9%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	16%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	8%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	9%	5 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	12%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	14%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	10%	5 Aug →