RaZoN^

RaZoN^ — CS2 Stats

US76561197969340267[U:1:9074539]Steam profile ↗

465Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,671Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2507 of 22965 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaZoN^FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,671 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62371Last 10062%Win rateWLLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression5.9
Utility4.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time528ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–6
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 53% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2013765%-0.01
nukeB179853%-0.00
dust2B158753%0.00
ancientS1511473%-0.02
infernoA149564%0.01
anubisS97278%0.02
cacheA74357%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.05
fachwerk110100%-0.05
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

321Matches
57%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2658%1.1114.7
Dust22264%0.9213.9
Ancient1457%1.0014.8
Anubis1258%1.3016.3
Nuke956%1.2415.3
Inferno729%0.8715.1
Cache580%1.1516.2
Vertigo10%0.9120.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
521msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.65HE damage / grenade
5.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–13-0.028%28 Aug
vertigo14–16-0.0516%28 Aug
inferno9–130.0136%28 Aug
dust222–180.0125%27 Aug
anubis11–130.0112%26 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0518%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0425%25 Aug
dust213–100.0322%25 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0918%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0520%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0520%25 Aug
cache13–9-0.0423%25 Aug
nuke13–7-0.007%25 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0432%23 Aug
mirage13–10.0320%21 Aug
cache13–50.0229%21 Aug
dust21–4-0.030%21 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0211%21 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0118%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0023%19 Aug
mirage10–10.0430%19 Aug
ancient16–130.0322%19 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0516%19 Aug
nuke0–13-0.090%19 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0611%18 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0011%17 Aug
dust28–130.0225%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0119%17 Aug
mirage11–130.0215%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0228%14 Aug
anubis13–50.0611%14 Aug
dust213–10.0433%14 Aug
nuke9–130.0319%14 Aug
ancient13–100.0225%13 Aug
anubis13–60.1235%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0021%13 Aug
inferno13–50.0316%13 Aug
cache11–13-0.0116%13 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0313%13 Aug
nuke13–40.0722%12 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0218%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0118%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0216%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0123%11 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0215%8 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0313%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0120%7 Aug
cache13–100.0617%7 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0120%7 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0411%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0520%5 Aug
inferno13–80.1014%5 Aug
cache13–100.0013%5 Aug
dust216–14-0.0216%5 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0114%4 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0535%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0219%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.079%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0613%30 Jul
inferno13–70.0714%30 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0115%30 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0317%30 Jul
cache10–13-0.0333%30 Jul
mirage13–20.0328%30 Jul
inferno13–60.0117%30 Jul
dust213–8-0.0723%29 Jul
mirage13–90.0118%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0629%28 Jul
cache8–130.0219%15 Jul
ancient13–100.0221%15 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0016%15 Jul
dust24–13-0.0410%14 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.0536%10 Jul
nuke13–100.0411%10 Jul
dust23–130.0731%10 Jul
dust213–30.0531%8 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0219%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0727%7 Jul
inferno13–60.0224%6 Jul
dust213–60.0622%6 Jul
nuke16–130.0527%6 Jul
dust26–13-0.0220%5 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0022%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0029%3 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0123%3 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0418%3 Jul
inferno13–70.0518%3 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0111%2 Jul
nuke15–150.0128%2 Jul
ancient10–130.0019%1 Jul
anubis11–130.0136%1 Jul
nuke9–130.0123%1 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0218%1 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0417%1 Jul
nuke13–60.0119%30 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0519%30 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0031%30 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0415%30 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0327%30 Jun
nuke16–140.0317%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →