poop — CS2 Stats
76561197998880736[U:1:38615008]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 44 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 inferno | S | 9 | 6–3 | 67% | 0.03 |
 nuke | D | 7 | 2–5 | 29% | 0.02 |
 mirage | S | 7 | 6–1 | 86% | 0.05 |
 ancient | S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | 0.04 |
 overpass | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | -0.00 |
 anubis | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | 0.03 |
 vertigo | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.03 |
 cache | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.09 |
Across the last 44 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.063% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 0–13 | -0.09 | 67% | 19 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 16 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.04 | 13% | 16 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.09 | 23% | 16 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.09 | 31% | 15 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | 0.07 | 27% | 13 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | -0.00 | 27% | 13 Aug → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 13 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.03 | 24% | 13 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | 0.11 | 26% | 12 Aug → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | 0.10 | 28% | 12 Aug → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.02 | 19% | 12 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.10 | 40% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.08 | 21% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 12–16 | 0.04 | 14% | 11 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.03 | 13% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.06 | 25% | 29 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 6–13 | -0.03 | 26% | 29 Jan → | |
| overpass | 2–0 | 0.02 | 100% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.00 | 26% | 29 Jan → | |
| anubis | 16–14 | 0.03 | 23% | 29 Jan → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.02 | 21% | 29 Jan → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 21 Jan → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 21 Jan → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.03 | 31% | 20 Jan → | |
| overpass | 13–5 | -0.09 | 12% | 20 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.00 | 19% | 20 Jan → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.06 | 27% | 18 Jan → | |
| ancient | 15–15 | 0.01 | 28% | 18 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 3–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 18 Jan → | |
| ancient | 15–15 | -0.00 | 22% | 17 Jan → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | 0.12 | 22% | 12 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.11 | 20% | 12 Jan → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | -0.01 | 39% | 12 Jan → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 10 Jan → | |
| overpass | 13–16 | -0.00 | 20% | 9 Jan → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | -0.08 | 25% | 9 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.00 | 26% | 9 Jan → | |
| overpass | 13–7 | 0.08 | 20% | 9 Jan → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 7 Jan → | |
| mirage | 16–12 | 0.02 | 18% | 7 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.15 | 25% | 7 Jan → | |
| overpass | 7–13 | -0.03 | 33% | 7 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.10 | 30% | 5 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.
