VeryBusyOwl — CS2 Stats

76561197964132013[U:1:3866285]✓ No bans

2,450Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVeryBusyOwlFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning43
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46531Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7
Aggression6.5
Utility6.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning4.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time621ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
813In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 22dust2Weakest map · 39% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2391439%-0.01
infernoC23101343%0.02
mirageA22121055%-0.00
nukeB136746%0.02
anubisB63350%-0.00
ancientC52340%0.01
overpass42250%0.02
cache31233%-0.00
vertigo110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

596Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
77.8ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5845%0.9513.8
Dust24657%0.9712.9
Inferno3959%1.1615.8
Nuke2673%1.3815.6
Ancient2458%0.9515.1
Anubis1753%0.8413.3
Cache729%0.9012.7
Train450%1.0215.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.5%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
12.9°Preaim
625msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
14.11HE damage / grenade
11.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.89° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.4763% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.015%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0020%29 Aug
dust213–100.0012%28 Aug
dust210–130.0011%24 Aug
cache5–130.027%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.007%24 Aug
inferno13–4-0.006%22 Aug
cache13–9-0.045%22 Aug
inferno19–170.0310%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.065%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.026%15 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0013%11 Aug
mirage9–130.0412%11 Aug
dust216–12-0.0312%10 Aug
inferno13–70.028%9 Aug
inferno11–130.0217%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0312%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0423%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.059%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0815%25 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0412%14 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0126%13 Jul
ancient10–13-0.035%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0011%10 Jul
mirage13–90.006%7 Jul
mirage13–110.0310%1 Jul
ancient8–130.1314%28 Jun
dust27–13-0.0013%27 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0617%27 Jun
inferno13–80.0812%24 Jun
mirage11–130.0226%21 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0014%20 Jun
nuke16–130.0321%20 Jun
inferno6–90.0216%19 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0215%19 Jun
cache9–130.018%13 Jun
dust213–7-0.0420%13 Jun
dust213–10-0.0011%10 Jun
dust29–13-0.0311%10 Jun
dust213–10.0221%9 Jun
dust210–13-0.056%8 Jun
vertigo13–100.0812%7 Jun
inferno9–13-0.047%5 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0216%4 Jun
anubis13–50.014%3 Jun
dust27–13-0.0217%3 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0116%30 May
nuke13–10-0.0019%29 May
mirage11–13-0.0424%29 May
mirage19–17-0.046%23 May
overpass7–130.029%22 May
inferno10–130.0312%22 May
anubis3–13-0.0212%18 May
dust213–9-0.0317%18 May
nuke11–13-0.0114%18 May
dust27–130.0214%16 May
ancient6–13-0.057%16 May
nuke14–16-0.0812%14 May
inferno13–80.0515%13 May
inferno14–16-0.009%13 May
dust29–13-0.0412%12 May
inferno4–13-0.0124%12 May
inferno13–50.0216%12 May
mirage16–120.0612%11 May
dust27–130.0416%11 May
nuke13–40.143%9 May
mirage13–100.0111%9 May
inferno6–13-0.0110%9 May
mirage13–10-0.0215%7 May
inferno11–130.0418%7 May
inferno13–70.039%6 May
inferno9–130.0112%5 May
nuke9–130.066%5 May
mirage13–20.0618%4 May
nuke13–4-0.0024%2 May
mirage13–50.0113%2 May
inferno6–4-0.008%30 Apr
dust211–130.1132%30 Apr
nuke11–13-0.015%30 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0221%29 Apr
nuke9–130.0219%29 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0311%29 Apr
nuke13–70.0816%28 Apr
mirage13–90.0112%27 Apr
dust213–60.0012%27 Apr
inferno13–90.0613%22 Apr
mirage11–130.0214%21 Apr
anubis15–150.0210%20 Apr
nuke11–130.0320%20 Apr
ancient13–40.0114%19 Apr
overpass13–40.0915%18 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0114%18 Apr
inferno4–130.0219%16 Apr
dust212–16-0.0114%16 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0317%15 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0114%14 Apr
inferno9–130.0516%13 Apr
dust210–13-0.049%13 Apr
mirage13–100.0313%12 Apr
dust26–130.0726%12 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →