MasTeRnoOk[st]

MasTeRnoOk[st] — CS2 Stats

US76561197963551237[U:1:3285509]Steam profile ↗

733Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMasTeRnoOk[st]FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58384Last 10058%Win rateTWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression6.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time583ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–5
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2491538%0.00
nukeC146843%-0.02
cacheA149564%0.03
mirageS118373%0.01
infernoS108280%0.01
anubisA85363%0.03
overpassB84450%-0.01
ancientS65183%0.03
office220100%-0.03
shelter1010%0.06
train110100%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

241Matches
58%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
75.5ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25066%1.0616.0
Inferno3262%0.9514.1
Nuke2654%0.9414.7
Cache2343%0.9914.1
Anubis2227%1.0514.9
Mirage2176%1.0215.1
Ancient1675%1.1616.0
Vertigo1362%1.0615.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
590msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
12.48HE damage / grenade
8.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5311% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–12-0.0325%20 Aug
dust213–40.0838%20 Aug
dust213–100.0122%17 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0023%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.0431%15 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0531%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0424%15 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0322%11 Aug
dust213–40.0124%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0326%8 Aug
cache13–110.0040%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0428%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0825%5 Aug
cache10–130.0020%2 Aug
inferno10–130.0129%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0220%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0315%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0221%28 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0333%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0822%25 Jul
dust214–16-0.0228%24 Jul
mirage13–50.0335%22 Jul
nuke13–90.0025%22 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0213%22 Jul
cache13–5-0.0421%20 Jul
cache10–130.0327%19 Jul
dust216–130.0431%13 Jul
anubis10–130.0121%12 Jul
cache0–13-0.060%12 Jul
dust213–30.0714%11 Jul
cache12–120.0525%11 Jul
shelter4–130.0613%11 Jul
anubis13–70.0729%11 Jul
inferno13–40.0623%10 Jul
cache17–190.0220%10 Jul
nuke1–13-0.077%10 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0313%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0310%10 Jul
cache13–50.0738%9 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0927%9 Jul
inferno13–20.0125%9 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0421%9 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0223%9 Jul
cache13–110.0131%9 Jul
dust210–130.0324%9 Jul
cache13–100.0825%9 Jul
office13–10-0.0127%9 Jul
office13–2-0.0530%9 Jul
mirage13–60.0646%8 Jul
inferno9–10.0535%8 Jul
overpass12–12-0.0320%8 Jul
ancient13–60.0233%8 Jul
cache13–20.0126%7 Jul
cache13–70.0733%7 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0718%3 Jul
ancient13–50.1128%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.0813%3 Jul
nuke13–40.0734%3 Jul
dust211–130.0130%3 Jul
nuke13–50.0533%3 Jul
overpass13–70.0422%3 Jul
anubis13–70.0320%3 Jul
ancient16–140.0425%3 Jul
dust210–13-0.0324%3 Jul
anubis13–60.0729%3 Jul
ancient13–10.0616%3 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0219%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0331%2 Jul
dust213–110.0123%2 Jul
nuke13–110.0415%30 Jun
overpass13–50.0418%30 Jun
dust214–160.0226%29 Jun
dust27–13-0.0221%29 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0613%27 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0520%27 Jun
dust210–13-0.0324%27 Jun
inferno5–00.0325%27 Jun
dust212–160.0419%27 Jun
nuke3–13-0.1010%27 Jun
cache13–60.0517%25 Jun
anubis13–90.0719%25 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0114%24 Jun
dust213–10-0.0211%24 Jun
anubis12–120.0529%24 Jun
dust213–20.0421%24 Jun
overpass13–10.0530%24 Jun
train13–9-0.0217%24 Jun
mirage13–50.0514%24 Jun
vertigo13–40.0320%23 Jun
cache13–40.1031%23 Jun
dust28–130.0422%23 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0317%23 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0729%23 Jun
dust27–13-0.0132%22 Jun
inferno13–60.0215%22 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0617%22 Jun
overpass13–110.0319%22 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0118%22 Jun
mirage7–130.0019%22 Jun
dust213–8-0.0029%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →