bobbyonion — CS2 Stats

76561197963225151[U:1:2959423]✓ No bans

1,280Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,809Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10460 of 19215 tracked

FaceitLevel 3 · 815 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60

Positioning46

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–45–1Last 10054%Win rateWLWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0

Aggression5.4

Utility4.8

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch1.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0

Positioning4.6

Utility4.8

Mechanics2.4

Opening Duels1.0

Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time606ms−26ms

first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy20.3%+2.9%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 10–13

13–1Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 42% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	29	16–13	55%	-0.01
dust2	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.03
anubis	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.01
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.04
ancient	S	13	9–4	69%	-0.01
cache	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches

44%Win rate

0.80Avg K/D

65.8ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	45	42%	0.78	11.7
Ancient	24	50%	0.83	12.5
Inferno	18	39%	0.79	13.2
Anubis	17	41%	0.91	13.1
Dust2	13	46%	0.67	11.1
Overpass	4	50%	0.74	10.5
Nuke	1	100%	1.44	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy

35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

60.7%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

598msReaction time

37.5%T opening success

30.5%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

5.3%Flash assists

8.74HE damage / grenade

3.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.8991 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.5414% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–8	0.05	24%	28 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	7%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	10%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	26%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	21%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	12%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	24%	19 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	34%	18 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	7%	18 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	21%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	24%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.02	11%	5 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	30%	5 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	24%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	14%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	12%	31 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	19%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	19%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	14%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	25%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.08	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	28%	21 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.06	42%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	39%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	21%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	21%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.08	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	20%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.02	11%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	19%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.04	21%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–5	-0.00	21%	17 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	28%	17 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	21%	17 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	10%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	13%	17 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	25%	28 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	23%	28 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	23%	6 May →
mirage	13–7	0.00	23%	6 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	20%	6 May →
anubis	13–1	0.11	27%	6 May →
ancient	13–5	0.02	17%	5 May →
cache	13–7	-0.02	34%	5 May →
cache	13–11	0.05	23%	5 May →
cache	6–13	-0.08	29%	4 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	14%	1 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	25%	1 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	15%	1 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	21%	1 May →
anubis	13–4	0.04	27%	30 Apr →
anubis	3–13	-0.10	17%	29 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	17%	29 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.03	20%	29 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	12%	28 Apr →
inferno	7–2	-0.04	33%	28 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.11	14%	28 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	16%	14 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	13%	14 Apr →
ancient	13–2	0.05	22%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	22%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	25%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	8%	10 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.02	22%	7 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.00	16%	7 Apr →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	23%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	14%	6 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.09	17%	4 Apr →
overpass	1–13	-0.06	15%	4 Apr →
ancient	16–14	0.01	16%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.03	20%	4 Apr →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	16%	28 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	15%	28 Mar →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	18%	27 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.02	24%	24 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.02	16%	24 Mar →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	21%	20 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.01	18%	19 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	12%	19 Mar →
anubis	16–13	-0.00	13%	12 Mar →
mirage	16–13	0.00	14%	12 Mar →
ancient	16–14	0.02	22%	11 Mar →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	24%	11 Mar →
dust2	10–13	0.01	21%	11 Mar →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	21%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.00	5%	7 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	2%	7 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	14%	7 Mar →
anubis	9–13	-0.08	12%	7 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	15%	28 Feb →
anubis	13–5	0.05	31%	28 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.07	18%	28 Feb →