0ak1and

0ak1and — CS2 Stats

76561197971628898[U:1:11363170]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,379Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,913Blue band · top ~50.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14350 of 19872 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG0ak1andFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER10,913 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning31
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0
Aggression3.2
Utility5.6
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 677ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning3.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time683ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 703ms → last ⅓ avg 683ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35191654%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
nukeA127558%0.01
mirageA117464%-0.01
ancientC83538%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.03
anubis41325%0.00
vertigo4040%-0.00
train110100%-0.04
overpass1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
48%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
64.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

15%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage944%0.7811.0
Anubis650%1.0416.8
Ancient560%0.689.8
Dust2450%0.7411.3
Inferno250%0.7711.5
Train1100%0.8618.0
Nuke10%0.285.0
Vertigo10%0.5010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
677msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
10.70HE damage / grenade
7.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.847% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0420%26 Aug
dust213–3-0.1031%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0633%26 Aug
dust213–40.0123%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0717%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0920%4 Aug
dust211–6-0.0021%4 Aug
dust213–4-0.017%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0319%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0324%2 Aug
dust29–130.0624%30 Jul
inferno13–110.0415%29 Jul
anubis13–40.0421%29 Jul
nuke13–80.0315%29 Jul
anubis14–160.0224%26 Jul
mirage13–00.000%11 Jul
nuke13–40.0815%10 Jul
dust211–130.0116%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0112%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.1014%10 Jul
dust213–100.0321%9 Jul
dust26–130.0125%9 Jul
cache13–50.0116%9 Jul
dust210–50.0642%5 Jul
dust21–13-0.1033%5 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0114%5 Jul
dust213–70.0218%26 Jun
dust213–6-0.0529%26 Jun
inferno5–70.0319%26 Jun
nuke11–20.0122%25 Jun
inferno1–13-0.110%25 Jun
dust20–13-0.1012%25 Jun
cache13–10-0.0217%25 Jun
dust213–8-0.0216%21 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0017%20 Jun
inferno6–13-0.075%20 Jun
dust212–12-0.0418%20 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0223%20 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0318%18 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0623%18 Jun
inferno4–00.0333%18 Jun
cache4–13-0.0413%18 Jun
nuke9–130.0327%17 Jun
ancient6–130.0016%17 Jun
vertigo4–130.0532%13 Jun
dust213–80.0533%13 Jun
inferno13–60.0921%13 Jun
nuke2–8-0.0513%13 Jun
dust213–70.0126%10 Jun
nuke12–50.0721%8 Jun
inferno13–80.0513%8 Jun
dust212–120.0124%8 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0115%8 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0319%7 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0226%7 Jun
dust213–6-0.0026%7 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0532%7 Jun
train13–11-0.0417%7 Jun
dust24–13-0.0526%6 Jun
inferno11–130.0618%6 Jun
dust213–50.0320%6 Jun
dust213–00.1929%6 Jun
inferno0–13-0.080%6 Jun
dust24–13-0.0034%6 Jun
nuke13–10.0827%6 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.060%6 Jun
dust213–10-0.0024%5 Jun
dust213–50.0622%29 May
dust25–130.0421%29 May
vertigo12–120.0317%29 May
nuke11–130.0921%29 May
dust212–12-0.0118%27 May
cache5–13-0.0320%27 May
mirage13–70.0833%26 May
ancient9–13-0.0624%26 May
dust213–90.0022%21 May
nuke12–12-0.0615%21 May
dust27–13-0.0912%19 May
cache10–13-0.0912%19 May
inferno13–50.0118%11 May
dust213–16-0.0219%11 May
cache8–13-0.0325%11 May
inferno13–110.0225%11 May
dust29–13-0.0219%11 May
dust213–8-0.0423%10 May
vertigo7–13-0.0214%9 May
cache13–6-0.0115%9 May
mirage6–13-0.0920%9 May
anubis13–16-0.0021%9 May
inferno7–13-0.0722%9 May
cache12–120.0021%29 Apr
ancient13–60.0410%27 Apr
mirage13–90.0313%27 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0242%26 Apr
overpass12–120.0318%26 Apr
dust28–13-0.0513%26 Apr
inferno13–0-0.0060%26 Apr
dust213–8-0.0022%25 Apr
inferno13–100.0332%25 Apr
mirage16–130.0218%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →