trG嵐 — CS2 Stats

76561197960660829[U:1:395101]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,558Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning62

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression8.7

Utility5.5

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels3.9

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning6.2

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time584ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+2.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — office 13–11

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	21	14–7	67%	0.00
inferno	A	18	10–8	56%	0.03
dust2	A	13	8–5	62%	0.01
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	0.06
office	C	9	4–5	44%	0.06
anubis	C	8	3–5	38%	0.03
nuke	S	8	6–2	75%	0.04
ancient	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.00
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

331Matches

56%Win rate

1.56Avg K/D

—ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	1	0%	1.62	26.0
Mirage	1	0%	1.15	15.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.12	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.6%Spray accuracy

75.8%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

570msReaction time

35.9%T opening success

55.4%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

11.1%Flash assists

13.04HE damage / grenade

4.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3976 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.8972% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–14	-0.05	23%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	19%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	30%	9 Aug →
office	5–13	0.06	26%	21 Jul →
office	6–13	0.03	27%	21 Jul →
office	11–13	0.06	14%	20 Jul →
office	4–13	0.01	27%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.05	15%	18 Jul →
office	13–8	-0.02	18%	11 Jul →
office	13–8	0.09	25%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.04	26%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.10	13%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.01	12%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	26%	1 Jul →
office	13–11	0.17	23%	29 Jun →
office	13–11	0.06	33%	26 Jun →
office	7–13	0.08	36%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	17%	25 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.06	21%	20 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.01	20%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.05	19%	24 May →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	4%	17 May →
cache	6–13	0.06	21%	16 May →
cache	10–13	0.04	16%	16 May →
nuke	13–7	0.07	13%	9 May →
cache	2–13	0.03	23%	3 May →
cache	13–4	0.12	12%	3 May →
cache	5–13	0.01	25%	3 May →
cache	13–9	0.10	22%	2 May →
cache	13–7	0.10	19%	2 May →
cache	11–13	0.04	13%	2 May →
cache	2–6	0.10	29%	2 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	15%	26 Apr →
inferno	8–13	0.00	47%	19 Apr →
inferno	4–13	0.05	21%	18 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.04	15%	18 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.13	13%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.05	13%	13 Apr →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	10%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.04	22%	11 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.04	13%	10 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.08	16%	8 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	9%	7 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	18%	6 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.01	21%	5 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	11%	5 Apr →
anubis	13–2	0.08	18%	29 Mar →
inferno	13–7	0.09	20%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.00	19%	21 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	18%	16 Mar →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	15%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.03	25%	15 Mar →
nuke	13–10	0.05	23%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.00	25%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	16%	8 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	14%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–1	0.05	25%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.00	10%	7 Mar →
inferno	7–13	0.04	20%	28 Feb →
overpass	11–13	-0.01	16%	25 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	13%	25 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.00	15%	22 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	11%	20 Feb →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	19%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.02	36%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.00	24%	18 Feb →
overpass	16–14	0.07	12%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.09	23%	16 Feb →
inferno	16–14	0.07	17%	16 Feb →
anubis	7–13	0.01	20%	14 Feb →
inferno	15–15	0.00	21%	9 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.06	24%	9 Feb →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	28%	9 Feb →
dust2	13–9	0.01	8%	8 Feb →
overpass	13–3	0.16	11%	8 Feb →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	21%	8 Feb →
dust2	9–13	0.04	11%	8 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	13%	7 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	14%	7 Feb →
mirage	15–15	0.01	23%	7 Feb →
inferno	13–16	0.02	19%	6 Feb →
nuke	13–2	0.03	20%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.00	9%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–6	0.08	20%	5 Feb →
nuke	13–5	0.03	25%	4 Feb →
overpass	13–4	0.07	9%	3 Feb →
dust2	15–15	0.05	23%	2 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.01	9%	1 Feb →
inferno	13–7	0.06	29%	1 Feb →
anubis	10–13	0.04	8%	1 Feb →
inferno	13–7	0.08	22%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–1	0.00	15%	1 Feb →
overpass	13–6	0.02	26%	1 Feb →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	24%	31 Jan →
inferno	13–8	0.02	17%	31 Jan →
ancient	9–13	0.04	22%	31 Jan →
nuke	13–7	0.07	14%	31 Jan →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	12%	30 Jan →
mirage	13–4	-0.06	26%	29 Jan →
ancient	9–13	0.01	11%	29 Jan →