Amazing187 — CS2 Stats

76561197960444014[U:1:178286]✓ No bans

612Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,267Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2154 of 8030 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAmazing187PREMIER23,267 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning40
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49492Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression0.8
Utility5.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch7.2

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time521ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8anubisWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26121446%-0.01
nukeC1971237%-0.02
infernoS1813572%0.02
anubisD1541127%-0.01
cacheC104640%-0.02
ancientS87188%0.01
overpass42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

634Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
81.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno333%0.9313.3
Dust2333%0.8914.3
Nuke250%0.9316.0
Anubis250%1.3020.0
Mirage1100%1.1727.0
Ancient1100%1.8018.0
Cache1100%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
517msReaction time
11.6%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
9.48HE damage / grenade
14.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.48 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.6358% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–13-0.0114%26 Aug
anubis2–11-0.0338%26 Aug
dust23–130.0228%26 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0223%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0410%22 Aug
inferno13–20.0921%22 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0028%22 Aug
dust214–16-0.0017%22 Aug
cache0–13-0.0936%22 Aug
nuke8–130.0026%22 Aug
inferno13–90.038%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0425%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0413%21 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0519%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0527%20 Aug
cache8–130.0323%20 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0919%18 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0317%18 Aug
cache13–8-0.0721%16 Aug
dust213–20.0419%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.0826%15 Aug
inferno15–150.0228%15 Aug
nuke16–130.0722%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.0910%15 Aug
cache11–130.0124%15 Aug
inferno4–130.0242%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0215%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0517%8 Aug
dust213–9-0.0532%8 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0710%8 Aug
dust216–140.0113%4 Aug
inferno13–70.0313%4 Aug
dust215–15-0.0626%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0631%2 Aug
nuke13–20.0417%2 Aug
anubis13–40.0731%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0119%1 Aug
dust213–40.1225%1 Aug
anubis6–130.0819%1 Aug
nuke13–60.0121%1 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0624%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0020%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0413%26 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0827%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.017%25 Jul
cache13–110.0215%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0725%25 Jul
dust211–130.0114%25 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0715%25 Jul
inferno7–3-0.0140%25 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0317%18 Jul
anubis9–130.0217%18 Jul
dust213–11-0.0112%18 Jul
cache13–40.0510%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0517%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.0120%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0513%12 Jul
inferno13–80.0123%12 Jul
dust213–80.0723%12 Jul
inferno7–130.0028%12 Jul
nuke12–160.0423%12 Jul
cache13–10-0.0521%11 Jul
anubis13–6-0.029%11 Jul
dust213–50.0016%11 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0120%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0313%11 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0311%11 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0517%5 Jul
overpass13–3-0.0518%5 Jul
dust210–13-0.0318%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0727%5 Jul
nuke5–13-0.087%5 Jul
inferno13–10.0719%5 Jul
dust213–7-0.0016%5 Jul
inferno5–13-0.066%4 Jul
overpass13–100.1132%4 Jul
dust213–11-0.0525%4 Jul
dust213–20.0017%4 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0418%4 Jul
ancient13–40.055%4 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0211%4 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0418%3 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0039%3 Jul
inferno13–60.0534%3 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0133%3 Jul
ancient16–130.0425%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0226%3 Jul
inferno13–110.0121%3 Jul
dust213–80.0224%3 Jul
anubis7–130.0321%28 Jun
overpass14–16-0.0121%28 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0621%28 Jun
dust29–130.0221%28 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0212%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0417%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.029%14 Jun
dust213–80.0526%14 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0326%14 Jun
inferno13–40.1221%31 May
dust25–13-0.0112%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →