Bye — CS2 Stats
76561199856071888[U:1:1895806160]Steam profile ↗
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 90 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | B | 52 | 26–26 | 50% | 0.02 |
 cache | A | 29 | 17–12 | 59% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.05 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.01 |
 anubis | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.00 |
Across the last 90 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 52). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.1058 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.0238% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.05 | 70% | 25 May → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.01 | 59% | 15 May → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.06 | 32% | 14 May → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.00 | 35% | 14 May → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.01 | 43% | 14 May → | |
| mirage | 0–2 | 0.00 | 0% | 14 May → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.08 | 37% | 14 May → | |
| cache | 10–8 | -0.03 | 48% | 14 May → | |
| mirage | 5–1 | 0.19 | 64% | 14 May → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.01 | 41% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.02 | 51% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 3–0 | 0.02 | 33% | 13 May → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.00 | 36% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 13–5 | -0.03 | 53% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.03 | 34% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 11–9 | 0.11 | 38% | 12 May → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.02 | 63% | 12 May → | |
| cache | 3–13 | -0.19 | 0% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.04 | 54% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.02 | 37% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.03 | 44% | 12 May → | |
| cache | 13–1 | -0.01 | 36% | 11 May → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.07 | 43% | 11 May → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.04 | 36% | 11 May → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.07 | 56% | 11 May → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.08 | 29% | 11 May → | |
| cache | 13–3 | 0.02 | 43% | 10 May → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.00 | 42% | 10 May → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.04 | 29% | 10 May → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.04 | 44% | 10 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.05 | 51% | 10 May → | |
| cache | 2–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 9 May → | |
| cache | 3–13 | 0.02 | 39% | 9 May → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.04 | 29% | 9 May → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.01 | 30% | 9 May → | |
| cache | 13–3 | 0.06 | 50% | 9 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.09 | 37% | 8 May → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.10 | 50% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.08 | 41% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 7–13 | -0.01 | 28% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.06 | 44% | 8 May → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.10 | 48% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 4–5 | -0.02 | 54% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.00 | 25% | 6 May → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.03 | 34% | 6 May → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.02 | 32% | 6 May → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.03 | 59% | 6 May → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.03 | 59% | 5 May → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.03 | 48% | 4 May → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.02 | 29% | 4 May → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.09 | 30% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 5–13 | 0.05 | 48% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–11 | -0.03 | 34% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 5–1 | 0.05 | 50% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.07 | 40% | 30 Apr → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.06 | 42% | 27 Apr → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.03 | 37% | 27 Apr → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.06 | 40% | 23 Apr → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.03 | 45% | 23 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.06 | 41% | 23 Apr → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.02 | 34% | 23 Apr → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.02 | 35% | 20 Apr → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.01 | 44% | 17 Apr → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.01 | 55% | 17 Apr → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.01 | 52% | 17 Apr → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.07 | 50% | 16 Apr → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.04 | 31% | 16 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.03 | 31% | 15 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.02 | 67% | 8 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.06 | 60% | 5 Apr → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.01 | 64% | 19 Mar → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.00 | 52% | 17 Mar → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.01 | 38% | 26 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.04 | 58% | 26 Aug → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | 0.07 | 39% | 25 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.10 | 48% | 25 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 0–4 | -0.01 | 0% | 22 Aug → | |
| mirage | 1–8 | -0.10 | 0% | 15 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | 0.04 | 41% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.06 | 58% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.08 | 59% | 13 Aug → | |
| overpass | 13–7 | -0.01 | 47% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.11 | 59% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.05 | 33% | 24 Jun → | |
| mirage | 8–0 | 0.05 | 47% | 22 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–2 | -0.00 | 27% | 19 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.01 | 48% | 19 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | -0.02 | 47% | 19 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.07 | 66% | 18 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.11 | 51% | 12 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.