tapwaterg0blin — CS2 Stats

76561199808011170[U:1:1847745442]

990Tracked matches54%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,674Purple band · top ~17.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7892 of 14048 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,988 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtapwaterg0blinFACEITLevel 10 · 1,988 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER17,674 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning58
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60373Last 10060%Win rateWLWWWWWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3
Aggression8.1
Utility4.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time525ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 21anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26161062%0.03
mirageS2115671%0.03
cacheA1610663%0.00
anubisC125742%0.02
ancientB115645%0.02
officeA53260%0.03
nuke31233%-0.00
italy220100%0.04
fachwerk110100%0.06
boulder110100%0.12
shelter1010%0.09
inferno110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

837Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
82.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27050%1.1916.6
Ancient15548%1.1917.5
Dust215149%1.1516.3
Nuke8652%1.2317.3
Anubis7267%1.1717.2
Cache4171%1.3716.5
Overpass2250%1.1718.4
Inferno2040%1.0917.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
42.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.1%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
531msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
9.14HE damage / grenade
4.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4618 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.218% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
fachwerk13–110.0619%28 Aug
anubis5–130.0625%28 Aug
boulder13–100.1223%28 Aug
anubis13–70.0527%28 Aug
ancient13–70.0123%28 Aug
anubis13–4-0.025%28 Aug
anubis13–40.0443%28 Aug
ancient5–130.0418%28 Aug
anubis10–130.0710%28 Aug
ancient12–120.0026%27 Aug
anubis12–12-0.018%27 Aug
nuke13–100.0117%27 Aug
anubis10–130.0131%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0819%27 Aug
shelter8–130.0933%24 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0418%24 Aug
ancient4–130.0536%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0945%24 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0322%22 Aug
office3–130.0117%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0214%21 Aug
office10–13-0.0522%21 Aug
office13–40.1130%21 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0427%21 Aug
office13–90.0524%21 Aug
office13–100.0124%21 Aug
anubis7–130.0118%21 Aug
cache4–00.000%21 Aug
italy13–40.0641%21 Aug
cache13–110.0426%20 Aug
cache13–2-0.0118%20 Aug
italy13–50.0227%20 Aug
cache13–80.0723%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0129%20 Aug
cache4–13-0.1813%20 Aug
cache12–120.0535%20 Aug
anubis7–20.1017%20 Aug
dust213–80.0625%19 Aug
ancient13–50.0327%19 Aug
dust29–130.0129%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0323%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0114%15 Aug
ancient16–140.0221%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0211%15 Aug
cache16–14-0.0617%13 Aug
inferno13–20.0827%9 Aug
dust213–30.0211%9 Aug
cache3–13-0.0736%9 Aug
nuke9–130.0729%8 Aug
dust210–40.0131%7 Aug
dust22–13-0.0533%7 Aug
dust216–14-0.0222%7 Aug
cache13–90.0713%7 Aug
mirage13–10.1529%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0421%7 Aug
dust213–80.0529%7 Aug
dust210–60.0619%7 Aug
mirage13–20.0113%7 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%6 Aug
cache13–6-0.0028%6 Aug
cache2–13-0.0950%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0521%6 Aug
cache13–50.0924%6 Aug
dust213–40.0816%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.0912%6 Aug
cache13–110.0821%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0622%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0416%5 Aug
dust214–16-0.0515%5 Aug
dust213–90.0320%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0233%5 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0612%5 Aug
dust213–80.0329%5 Aug
dust213–30.1025%5 Aug
dust211–130.0318%4 Aug
cache10–13-0.0235%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0714%4 Aug
dust21–13-0.1011%4 Aug
dust216–140.0719%4 Aug
mirage13–20.1025%4 Aug
mirage12–20.0228%3 Aug
mirage13–70.1027%3 Aug
cache13–70.0433%3 Aug
mirage13–40.0750%3 Aug
dust213–40.0215%3 Aug
dust213–30.1336%3 Aug
dust213–50.1540%3 Aug
dust22–80.0418%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0121%2 Aug
dust213–00.0641%2 Aug
ancient8–130.0423%2 Aug
mirage11–00.0550%2 Aug
dust211–130.1224%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0519%2 Aug
mirage12–2-0.000%2 Aug
dust26–130.0827%30 Jul
mirage13–50.1232%30 Jul
mirage13–70.1321%30 Jul
dust216–130.1121%30 Jul
anubis13–10.0327%30 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →