kayma0ke — CS2 Stats
76561199807639439[U:1:1847373711]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 9 median | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 66.3% | 48.5% | 51.9% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 13.3% | 13.7% | 13.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.11 short |
| Match win rate | 46.5% | 47.0% | 48.7% | 2.2% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 21 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 dust2 | C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | 0.01 |
 mirage | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | 0.05 |
 nuke | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.02 |
 ancient | — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | 0.02 |
 cache | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.01 |
 anubis | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.01 |
 inferno | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.02 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.00 |
Across the last 21 tracked matches.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 131 | 55% | 1.20 | 16.7 |
| Dust2 | 53 | 62% | 1.16 | 16.9 |
| Ancient | 37 | 32% | 1.06 | 17.4 |
| Inferno | 25 | 48% | 1.27 | 18.3 |
| Anubis | 24 | 42% | 1.24 | 16.5 |
| Nuke | 19 | 58% | 1.28 | 16.6 |
| Cache | 16 | 75% | 1.33 | 17.6 |
| Overpass | 11 | 64% | 1.26 | 14.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.9543% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.04 | 17% | 29 Aug → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 28 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.02 | 27% | 19 Aug → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.05 | 25% | 14 Aug → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.04 | 39% | 7 Aug → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 31 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.12 | 37% | 29 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–11 | 0.09 | 21% | 27 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 25 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.07 | 24% | 21 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.07 | 27% | 21 Jul → | |
| ancient | 5–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 7 Oct → | |
| dust2 | 12–16 | -0.03 | 15% | 6 Sept → | |
| ancient | 9–13 | -0.03 | 28% | 27 Jul → | |
| overpass | 4–13 | 0.00 | 6% | 24 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.05 | 22% | 15 Jul → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.00 | 15% | 8 Jul → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | 0.06 | 27% | 24 Jun → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | 0.02 | 29% | 15 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 1 May → |
Match data via Leetify.