HoldinMiD

HoldinMiD — CS2 Stats

76561199708308159[U:1:1748042431]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,246Tracked matches47%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,551 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHoldinMiDFACEITLevel 8 · 1,551 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning55
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40564Last 10040%Win rateWWLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression7.5
Utility6.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.5
Utility6.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time621ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 7–13
120Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7mirageWeakest map · 26% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2361726%0.00
dust2B1991047%0.01
ancientC1761135%0.03
nukeB158753%0.03
anubisC94544%0.03
infernoA74357%0.01
cacheD72529%-0.00
overpass2020%-0.01
office110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

745Matches
49%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
83.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19346%1.2016.3
Dust215445%1.2016.6
Ancient11457%1.2917.6
Inferno9945%1.0815.6
Anubis8349%1.1816.2
Nuke6256%1.4818.3
Train2148%1.3717.9
Overpass1258%1.2717.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
619msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
10.49HE damage / grenade
14.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7201% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0312%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0116%29 Aug
mirage11–130.0027%19 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0015%18 Aug
dust25–130.018%18 Aug
dust213–110.0219%14 Aug
dust210–130.0626%14 Aug
mirage3–130.0230%9 Aug
inferno13–30.029%8 Aug
cache14–16-0.0114%2 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0010%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0414%22 Jun
ancient12–00.014%22 Jun
ancient13–70.039%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0240%13 Jun
anubis13–50.1115%13 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0210%7 Jun
inferno11–130.0322%7 Jun
nuke16–140.0416%20 May
ancient7–130.049%20 May
mirage13–70.0917%19 May
dust210–13-0.048%19 May
dust26–130.0124%17 May
mirage5–13-0.0323%17 May
nuke1–13-0.057%16 May
dust28–13-0.0418%16 May
dust20–7-0.0317%16 May
nuke13–70.0924%14 May
mirage6–13-0.0216%12 May
anubis7–13-0.0323%10 May
mirage9–13-0.0415%10 May
nuke11–13-0.047%8 May
mirage3–13-0.0111%8 May
nuke9–13-0.0313%8 May
dust213–100.0210%8 May
mirage15–150.0619%8 May
nuke6–13-0.0419%7 May
office13–8-0.0423%7 May
mirage7–130.1524%7 May
anubis11–130.0613%7 May
ancient13–160.0818%7 May
nuke13–100.0716%6 May
anubis13–100.0813%6 May
mirage9–13-0.0220%6 May
dust213–9-0.0121%5 May
nuke6–130.0121%3 May
ancient13–110.0517%3 May
nuke13–30.0632%2 May
mirage16–14-0.0028%1 May
dust213–80.0522%1 May
ancient12–120.0511%1 May
cache3–13-0.0717%1 May
cache3–13-0.0419%1 May
nuke13–100.1115%1 May
dust213–60.0824%30 Apr
ancient16–140.039%30 Apr
cache11–13-0.0316%30 Apr
mirage6–130.0810%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0319%29 Apr
cache13–50.0321%29 Apr
cache12–120.0624%29 Apr
cache13–50.0425%29 Apr
dust27–13-0.0421%28 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0116%25 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0327%25 Apr
inferno4–13-0.040%25 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0311%25 Apr
anubis13–80.099%25 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0112%25 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0616%25 Apr
overpass6–130.0221%22 Apr
dust211–13-0.0522%22 Apr
nuke10–130.0420%21 Apr
dust213–100.0514%20 Apr
ancient5–130.0121%19 Apr
ancient6–130.128%19 Apr
dust25–13-0.0419%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0415%18 Apr
inferno5–130.0516%18 Apr
nuke6–13-0.059%18 Apr
ancient11–13-0.045%18 Apr
ancient13–11-0.009%16 Apr
ancient8–130.008%16 Apr
mirage10–13-0.059%16 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0118%15 Apr
dust210–10.0522%15 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0813%15 Apr
nuke13–110.0632%13 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0010%13 Apr
ancient8–130.1031%13 Apr
dust213–100.1519%12 Apr
inferno13–90.0620%12 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0413%12 Apr
mirage13–110.0610%11 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0317%11 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0118%11 Apr
mirage8–13-0.013%11 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0110%11 Apr
nuke13–100.0726%11 Apr
dust24–13-0.0213%11 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →