ΘΊniπ“œaster

ΘΊniπ“œaster β€” CS2 Stats

SV76561199706051667[U:1:1745785939]Steam profile β†—1 game ban

428Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating15,638Purple band Β· top ~25.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31414 of 54284 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGΘΊniπ“œasterFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,638 Β· Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning44
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateWWWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate Β· +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist β€” Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.6
Aggression6.9
Utility5.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch8.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash β€” utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 27% on T β€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start β€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01βˆ’0.03
first β…“ avg 0.04 β†’ last β…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time648msβˆ’22ms
first β…“ avg 669ms β†’ last β…“ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%βˆ’1.4%
first β…“ avg 22.6% β†’ last β…“ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating β€” overpass 13–4
13–0Biggest win β€” nuke
7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≀2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map Β· 60% over 5anubisWeakest map Β· 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3013–1743%0.01
dust2A2816–1257%0.03
nukeB126–650%0.03
ancientB63–350%0.02
anubisD61–517%0.01
vertigoD62–433%0.05
trainA53–260%0.01
infernoβ€”41–325%0.05
officeβ€”11–0100%0.04
overpassβ€”11–0100%0.22
palacioβ€”10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
51%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
85.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

61%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%1.3116.8
Inferno1040%1.1416.7
Anubis520%0.7713.6
Dust2450%2.5421.3
Ancient450%1.0318.3
Nuke367%0.9814.0
Overpass1100%2.0024.0
Vertigo1100%1.5012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API β€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches β€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
8.0Β°Preaim
647msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
10.07HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2193% β€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games β€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy β†’Anubis grenade lineups β†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0127%29 Aug β†’
dust213–10-0.0320%22 Aug β†’
ancient13–10.029%27 Jul β†’
dust213–40.0116%23 Jul β†’
mirage13–60.0915%20 Jul β†’
mirage13–50.1118%17 Jul β†’
mirage13–7-0.0228%15 Jul β†’
mirage8–130.0122%11 Jul β†’
ancient13–90.0511%10 Jul β†’
mirage3–13-0.0925%10 Jul β†’
ancient5–13-0.0021%10 Jul β†’
dust210–13-0.0316%10 Jul β†’
dust213–90.0313%9 Jul β†’
nuke10–13-0.0516%3 Jul β†’
anubis13–80.0325%27 Jun β†’
mirage10–130.0016%11 Jun β†’
mirage9–13-0.0319%13 May β†’
mirage12–12-0.0126%11 Apr β†’
dust27–130.0823%13 Mar β†’
dust213–70.0425%13 Mar β†’
vertigo6–130.0030%1 Mar β†’
mirage7–13-0.0118%21 Feb β†’
nuke11–13-0.0227%19 Feb β†’
mirage13–4-0.0321%18 Feb β†’
vertigo13–50.1433%15 Feb β†’
anubis0–130.0019%7 Feb β†’
mirage1–50.0213%30 Jan β†’
mirage4–13-0.0822%28 Jan β†’
dust29–13-0.0215%27 Jan β†’
mirage13–40.0236%26 Jan β†’
inferno8–80.0716%24 Jan β†’
mirage2–130.0026%18 Jan β†’
nuke10–130.0432%11 Jan β†’
dust213–50.0513%27 Dec β†’
vertigo12–120.038%17 Dec β†’
vertigo13–50.1229%17 Dec β†’
ancient13–30.0417%13 Dec β†’
dust213–10.1229%28 Nov β†’
office8–20.0432%27 Nov β†’
overpass13–40.2218%25 Nov β†’
inferno1–9-0.0911%25 Nov β†’
mirage0–13-0.0535%19 Nov β†’
train13–90.0430%18 Nov β†’
nuke7–130.0538%16 Nov β†’
dust213–110.0334%10 Nov β†’
dust210–130.0120%6 Nov β†’
train7–130.0126%6 Nov β†’
ancient15–150.0112%3 Nov β†’
dust213–40.0817%28 Oct β†’
dust28–130.0227%27 Oct β†’
vertigo3–13-0.0222%23 Oct β†’
mirage7–13-0.0117%23 Oct β†’
mirage7–130.0515%22 Oct β†’
mirage11–130.0529%20 Oct β†’
mirage11–13-0.049%19 Oct β†’
anubis7–50.0812%18 Oct β†’
anubis3–13-0.058%18 Oct β†’
mirage13–60.0518%17 Oct β†’
anubis9–130.0323%16 Oct β†’
nuke9–13-0.0338%15 Oct β†’
dust216–14-0.0521%15 Oct β†’
mirage6–13-0.0714%15 Oct β†’
train13–11-0.0126%15 Oct β†’
dust210–130.0040%15 Oct β†’
dust212–120.1542%14 Oct β†’
dust213–90.0532%14 Oct β†’
dust213–10-0.0612%14 Oct β†’
dust27–13-0.0215%13 Oct β†’
mirage9–130.0520%12 Oct β†’
mirage13–50.1523%12 Oct β†’
mirage13–90.0221%12 Oct β†’
mirage13–40.0915%12 Oct β†’
nuke13–70.0425%12 Oct β†’
dust210–13-0.0618%11 Oct β†’
dust22–13-0.0316%11 Oct β†’
train13–80.0227%11 Oct β†’
nuke13–60.0216%10 Oct β†’
nuke12–120.0424%10 Oct β†’
dust213–7-0.0014%8 Oct β†’
mirage13–60.0220%8 Oct β†’
inferno11–130.1131%8 Oct β†’
inferno9–30.1328%8 Oct β†’
nuke13–60.0530%8 Oct β†’
vertigo12–120.0621%7 Oct β†’
dust213–40.1729%6 Oct β†’
dust23–130.0320%6 Oct β†’
dust213–50.1125%6 Oct β†’
ancient7–13-0.0212%6 Oct β†’
dust26–130.0524%6 Oct β†’
nuke13–80.0154%5 Oct β†’
mirage13–11-0.0416%5 Oct β†’
mirage6–13-0.0423%5 Oct β†’
mirage13–80.0619%5 Oct β†’
dust213–110.0218%4 Oct β†’
train11–13-0.0420%4 Oct β†’
nuke13–00.0322%4 Oct β†’
palacio2–13-0.0533%3 Oct β†’
anubis6–13-0.0222%3 Oct β†’
nuke13–70.1521%2 Oct β†’
dust213–80.0824%2 Oct β†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone β†’Inventory value for this account β†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers β†’